DISCUSSION FORUMS
MAIN MENU
Home
Help
Advanced Search
Recent Posts
Site Statistics
Who's Online
Forum Rules
Bible Resources
• Bible Study Aids
• Bible Devotionals
• Audio Sermons
Community
• ChristiansUnite Blogs
• Christian Forums
Web Search
• Christian Family Sites
• Top Christian Sites
Family Life
• Christian Finance
• ChristiansUnite KIDS
Read
• Christian News
• Christian Columns
• Christian Song Lyrics
• Christian Mailing Lists
Connect
• Christian Singles
• Christian Classifieds
Graphics
• Free Christian Clipart
• Christian Wallpaper
Fun Stuff
• Clean Christian Jokes
• Bible Trivia Quiz
• Online Video Games
• Bible Crosswords
Webmasters
• Christian Guestbooks
• Banner Exchange
• Dynamic Content

Subscribe to our Free Newsletter.
Enter your email address:

ChristiansUnite
Forums
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 22, 2024, 09:08:30 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Our Lord Jesus Christ loves you.
287025 Posts in 27572 Topics by 3790 Members
Latest Member: Goodwin
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3
1  Theology / Debate / Re: Racism and Abortion go Hand in Hand on: June 24, 2006, 08:09:58 PM
If you look at demand #24 you will note that he wanted a positive Christianity that was state controlled. This positive Christianity was directed toward plitical correctness for the state and the German people. As for abortion. He outlawed abortions for the German people but used abortions to exterminate any one that where not citizens of the German empire. A lot of this nonsence below sounds a whole lot like what is going on today in America. Margaret Sanger adopted the beliefs of the teachings of Charles Darwin, Galton and Malthus. These beliefs considerd blacks and other races of people sub-human. And Margaret Sanger considered only 14% of the people in America fit enough to have children. Everyone else was condidered either morons or unfit and should have been kept in consitration camps and used as slave labor or eliminated all together.

The Programme of the German Workers' Party is designed to be of limited duration. The leaders have no intention, once the aims announced in it have been achieved, of establishing fresh ones, merely in order to increase, artificially, the discontent of the masses and so ensure the continued existence of the Party.

1. We demand the union of all Germany in a Greater Germany on the basis of the right of national self-determination.

2. We demand equality of rights for the German people in its dealings with other nations, and the revocation of the peace treaties of Versailles and Saint-Germain.

3. We demand land and territory (colonies) to feed our people and to settle our surplus population.

4. Only members of the nation may be citizens of the State. Only those of German blood, whatever be their creed, may be members of the nation. Accordingly, no Jew may be a member of the nation.

5. Non-citizens may live in Germany only as guests and must be subject to laws for aliens.

6. The right to vote on the State's government and legislation shall be enjoyed by the citizens of the State alone. We demand therefore that all official appointments, of whatever kind, whether in the Reich, in the states or in the smaller localities, shall be held by none but citizens.

We oppose the corrupting parliamentary custom of filling posts merely in accordance with party considerations, and without reference to character or abilities.

7. We demand that the State shall make it its primary duty to provide a livelihood for its citizens. If it should prove impossible to feed the entire population, foreign nationals (non-citizens) must be deported from the Reich.

8. All non-German immigration must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who entered Germany after 2 August 1914 shall be required to leave the Reich forthwith.

9. All citizens shall have equal rights and duties.

10. It must be the first duty of every citizen to perform physical or mental work. The activities of the individual must not clash with the general interest, but must proceed within the framework of the community and be for the general good.

We demand therefore:


11. The abolition of incomes unearned by work.

The breaking of the slavery of interest


12. In view of the enormous sacrifices of life and property demanded of a nation by any war, personal enrichment from war must be regarded as a crime against the nation. We demand therefore the ruthless confiscation of all war profits.

13. We demand the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into corporations (trusts).

14. We demand profit-sharing in large industrial enterprises.

15. We demand the extensive development of insurance for old age.

16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a healthy middle class, the immediate communalizing of big department stores, and their lease at a cheap rate to small traders, and that the utmost consideration shall be shown to all small traders in the placing of State and municiple orders.

17. We demand a land reform suitable to our national requirements, the passing of a law for the expropriation of land for communal purposes without compensation; the abolition of ground rent, and the prohibition of all speculation in land. *

18. We demand the ruthless prosecution of those whose activities are injurious to the common interest. Common criminals, usurers, profiteers, etc., must be punished with death, whatever their creed or race.

19. We demand that Roman Law, which serves a materialistic world order, be replaced by a German common law.

20. The State must consider a thorough reconstruction of our national system of education (with the aim of opening up to every able and hard-working German the possibility of higher education and of thus obtaining advancement). The curricula of all educational establishments must be brought into line with the requirements of practical life. The aim of the school must be to give the pupil, beginning with the first sign of intelligence, a grasp of the nation of the State (through the study of civic affairs). We demand the education of gifted children of poor parents, whatever their class or occupation, at the expense of the State.

21. The State must ensure that the nation's health standards are raised by protecting mothers and infants, by prohibiting child labor, by promoting physical strength through legislation providing for compulsory gymnastics and sports, and by the extensive support of clubs engaged in the physical training of youth.

22. We demand the abolition of the mercenary army and the foundation of a people's army.

23. We demand legal warfare on deliberate political mendacity and its dissemination in the press. To facilitate the creation of a German national press we demand:

(a) that all editors of, and contributors to newspapers appearing in the German language must be members of the nation;
(b) that no non-German newspapers may appear without the express permission of the State. They must not be printed in the German language;
(c) that non-Germans shall be prohibited by law from participating financially in or influencing German newspapers, and that the penalty for contravening such a law shall be the suppression of any such newspaper, and the immediate deportation of the non-Germans involved.

The publishing of papers which are not conducive to the national welfare must be forbidden. We demand the legal prosecution of all those tendencies in art and literature which corrupt our national life, and the suppression of cultural events which violate this demand.

24. We demand freedom for all religious denominations in the State, provided they do not threaten its existence not offend the moral feelings of the German race.

The Party, as such, stands for positive Christianity, but does not commit itself to any particular denomination. It combats the Jewish-materialistic spirit within and without us, and is convinced that our nation can achieve permanent health only from within on the basis of the principle: The common interest before self-interest.

25. To put the whole of this programme into effect, we demand the creation of a strong central state power for the Reich; the unconditional authority of the political central Parliament over the entire Reich and its organizations; and the formation of Corporations based on estate and occupation for the purpose of carrying out the general legislation passed by the Reich in the various German states.

The leaders of the Party promise to work ruthlessly -- if need be to sacrifice their very lives -- to translate this programme into action.

2  Theology / Debate / Re: Racism and Abortion go Hand in Hand on: June 24, 2006, 07:06:33 PM
It is very unfortunate that any race of babies has been aborted. However if you look at Margaret Sangers and Adolf Hitlers comments in context, their intention was to create a superior race. That is racism and they both intended to use abortion to accomplish that goal. It did not matter to them if most whites also aborted there children because they also included many whites in that catigory of undisirables.
3  Theology / Debate / Racism and Abortion go Hand in Hand on: June 24, 2006, 04:41:10 PM
One of the post on another sight asked if abortion was a sin. I fully believe that is so. Most people simply do not or refuse to understand the evil nature behind the abortion movement. In many of the articles that I have posted on my websites I explain what this evil is all about. My latest article is very contriversial but is designed to open the eyes of those that have kept them closed for far to long. The fight against racism belongs to every living being on this planet. To turn your back on the truth is the worst of these sins. And unfortunately, even many Christians have done that.


Article Against Racism By: Darwin Anthony
For an open discussion on this article go to my website and us the links and you can also read the article in its entirety.


Kill All Blacks, Mexicans and Jews!!!!

Let me ask you something. Does the above statement offend you? If it does, GOOD. Because it should offend anyone who hears and sees such statements. If it does not offend you then you are the one with the problem. Let me ask you something else. Does such a statement make any since to you at all?  It shouldn't. Yet by the end of the 1800's this was the exact attitude that was being promoted by the Socialist Elitist that where promoting Darwinism. Somehow this group of elitist was able to convince members of the black community that it was in their best interest to participate in their own destruction. I find it hard to understand the mind of a bigot. Even though there are even members of my own family who are some of the biggest bigots that I know. What I find even more appalling is the acceptance of these Neo-Nazi statements of these Socialist Elitist and the denials by Socialist that these statements ever happened. I have watched and listened to many people who have deliberately brushed off these charges because Socialism fits into their agenda. And it does not seem to bother them that there are policies of bigotry woven into the very fabric of Socialism. Bigotry has never died in America and it will fight to destroy as many lives as it can before the Lord finally puts an end to it with His second coming. But as hard as it is for me to understand the mind of a bigot, it is even harder for me to understand anyone who would participate in the destruction of ones own race. Whither it be black, white, or any other ethnic background. And what is worse is the fact that many of these people have tied themselves to a political party that has adopted the philosophies of some of the worst bigots in history. There are many right now who automatically assume that I am talking about the Republican party but you are dead wrong. Although the Republican Party does have its share of bigots it by know means has adopted the philosophies of one of the worse bigots in American history. And by no means has it ever adopted the philosophies of one of the worst murderers in history. No I am not talking about Adolf Hitler. Although he was a devote Socialist he is not the worst of the worst. Although there are some in the Republican Party who are socialist, the party as a whole does not subscribe to the views of socialism. Many people think that socialism holds a view point that all are equal in society. This however is far from the truth. As I said Hitler was a socialist. Other notable socialist included the likes of Stalin who butchered many of his own people. More recently in history we have Saddam Hussain who's Socialist Bath Party butchered hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's. What did these men have in common. The same thing that all Socialist have in common. They were elitist. But the question is, where did they get their philosophies from. Ultimately they adopted them from the socialist elitism agenda that Margaret Sanger helped prefect. Those on the left simply refuse to acknowledge that this is true but the evidence is overwhelming. So what do they do to refute this evidence? They twist the truth and claim that those on the right do nothing but promote hatred through the bible. They seek to make Gods word irrelevant and seek to make it politically correct. There is nothing irrelevant about sin. Nor is there anything politically correct about Gods word. God has given us all a chance by sending His Son to die on the cross for all of us. While you are still breathing you have that chance to receive forgiveness for your sins. The bible tells us what sin is but more to the point, God has given each of us the ability to understand right and wrong. Many however have turned away from doing what is right in Gods eye's, to doing what they want to believe is right in their own eyes. The philosophies of Margaret Sanger have been adopted by the liberals and used to kill millions of babies. So what do the Social elite do to appease their guilt. They claim that these babies are nothing but a piece of meat until they are actually born. The answer to how God feels about these unborn babies is clearly given to us in the bible.

1. In Luke 1:36 we read that Elizabeth had "conceived a son." Notice that the "product of conception," as pro-abortionist  would call "it," is simply called a "baby."

2. In Matthew 1:18, 23 and Luke 1:31 Mary is said to be "with child." This fulfilled the prophecy found in Isaiah 7:14 The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son.

3. When Rebekah conceived twins, it says, "the children struggled together within her..." (Genesis 25:22)

The unborn child is also referred to as a separate being, apart from the mother.

1. The unborn child is able to sense such feelings as "joy," etc. Luke 1:44, 45 Elizabeth's "baby leaped in [her] womb for joy."

2. The unborn baby, independent of the mother, made movements ("leaped") – so "it" cannot be reduced to merely a "part of the woman's body" – a necessary step in reducing the issue to that of "a woman's right."
  3. When Rebekah conceived, "the (twin) children struggled together within her..." (Genesis 25:22) They "struggled," not she. This reinforces the fact that the unborn child is a separate being apart from the mother. (See also Romans 9:10-11.)


And in Jeremiah 1:5 God states that the child even has a soul. "While you were being formed in the belly of the womb," God told the prophet Jeremiah, "I knew you and ordained (intended for) you to be a prophet to the nations."

 (Links removed due to linking to material too graphic for a family Christian forum)

Moderator

4  Theology / General Theology / Re:The Ten Commandments on: August 24, 2005, 12:27:36 AM
You are right bettyboop. However there is a godly fear that we should have because of our love and respect for Him as God. It is unfortunate though that so many people have no fear of God because they simply refuse to acknowledge Him as God. The bible tells us that the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. There are a lot of unwise people on this planet.
5  Theology / General Theology / Re:The Ten Commandments on: August 23, 2005, 02:46:44 PM
The title may be a little misleading.Jesus changed some of the laws,but He never changed the ten Commandments.

 Matthew 5
17 “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. 18 For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.

Jesus made it plain that he did not come to destroy the law. What He did by His death on the cross was to release those who trust in Him from the curse of the law. For those that refuse to trust in Him, they are still under the curse of the law. As for the Ten Commandments. He tried to simplify them for us because of our simple minds but by no means where any one of them done away with. They are there for our protection. And if we choose to throw them out, then we are throwing out Gods protection as well.
6  Theology / General Theology / Re:Peaceful religion isn't spelled Islam on: August 18, 2005, 10:42:04 PM
Amen Brother. Not many realise just how actively these people are working toward their agenda of Islamitazation of the world. All one needs do is a search on the term CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) to see just how active they are in their pursuit of these goals here in America. Another search on ACLU CAIR will show the many lawsuits that CAIR has to meet these goals being assisted by the notorious ACLU.

 
Thank you brother.

This is the last one of this series, I'm doing. That is unless, I am requested to do more. Don't get me started on the Anti Christian Lawless Union! Cheesy

In the arms of the Lord, I rest.
Bob

Psalm 119:50 This is my comfort and consolation in my affliction: that Your word has revived me and given me life.
I have been doing a little research on the connection between those on the left who don't have a problem with using violance and Islam. In fact there is an article on my website titled, Why Are Leftist So Enamored With Islam.
http://www.youchoose2008.org/whyareleftistsoenamoredwithislam.html
I'd be interested in your thoughts.
7  Theology / General Theology / Re:What is wrong with cloning? on: August 18, 2005, 02:14:24 PM
The interesting thing about this topic is that although man may someday be able to clone a human, the question that remaims is. Can man clone Gods spirit to put inside that human clone? I don't beleive so. The next question then will be. If that cloned body does not have a spirit will that open the door for an evil spirit to come in and inhabit that clone? Quit possible!
8  Theology / General Theology / The Ten Commandments on: August 18, 2005, 02:07:43 PM
Hello agian everyone. I intended to place a poll under this forum but put it under the Prayer Forum instead. But I will give some of the information here. I started a poll on a couple of other sites about the Ten Commandments. Here are the links to those sites.
http://www.freejesus.net/home/viewtopic.php?t=7272
http://www.renewamerica.us/bb/viewtopic.php?t=2977
You can go them and vote or just simply go to the Prayer Forum here and vote. I am interested in seeing the results. Thanks and God Bless
9  Prayer / General Discussion / The Ten Commandments on: August 18, 2005, 01:57:06 PM
Hello everyone. I have not been here in a while but I have been busy. I have place a poll on the site that I have place on a couple of other sites.
http://www.freejesus.net/home/viewtopic.php?t=7272
http://www.renewamerica.us/bb/viewtopic.php?t=2977
I'm interested in seeing what the difference between these site are in their results.
10  Prayer / General Discussion / The Ten Commandments on: August 18, 2005, 01:47:58 PM
Matthew 5  
17 “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. 18 For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled. 19 Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I say to you, that unless your righteousness exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven.

There are many that believe that the New Testament did away with the Old Testament and the Ten Commandments. Those that teach others that they are not relevent are teaching false doctrine. Jesus was indeed the fulfillment of the law but if you refuse His sacrifice for your sins, then you place yourself right under the consiquences of the Old Testament and the Ten Commandments. Those that teach political correctness have nothing but their own desires to see Gods word done away with to offer. But as you see, Jesus stated that not one word of the law will be done away with until heaven and earth has passed away.

Revelation 21
All Things Made New
    1 Now I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away. Also there was no more sea. 2 Then I, John,[a] saw the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. 3 And I heard a loud voice from heaven saying, “Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and He will dwell with them, and they shall be His people. God Himself will be with them and be their God. 4 And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes; there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor crying. There shall be no more pain, for the former things have passed away.”
5 Then He who sat on the throne said, “Behold, I make all things new.” And He said to me, “Write, for these words are true and faithful.”
6 And He said to me, “It is done![c] I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. I will give of the fountain of the water of life freely to him who thirsts. 7 He who overcomes shall inherit all things,[d] and I will be his God and he shall be My son. 8 But the cowardly, unbelieving,[e] abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.”
The New Jerusalem
   
9 Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls filled with the seven last plagues came to me[f] and talked with me, saying, “Come, I will show you the bride, the Lamb’s wife.”[g] 10 And he carried me away in the Spirit to a great and high mountain, and showed me the great city, the holy[h] Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God, 11 having the glory of God. Her light was like a most precious stone, like a jasper stone, clear as crystal. 12 Also she had a great and high wall with twelve gates, and twelve angels at the gates, and names written on them, which are the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel: 13 three gates on the east, three gates on the north, three gates on the south, and three gates on the west.
14 Now the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and on them were the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb. 15 And he who talked with me had a gold reed to measure the city, its gates, and its wall. 16 The city is laid out as a square; its length is as great as its breadth. And he measured the city with the reed: twelve thousand furlongs. Its length, breadth, and height are equal. 17 Then he measured its wall: one hundred and forty-four cubits, according to the measure of a man, that is, of an angel. 18 The construction of its wall was of jasper; and the city was pure gold, like clear glass. 19 The foundations of the wall of the city were adorned with all kinds of precious stones: the first foundation was jasper, the second sapphire, the third chalcedony, the fourth emerald, 20 the fifth sardonyx, the sixth sardius, the seventh chrysolite, the eighth beryl, the ninth topaz, the tenth chrysoprase, the eleventh jacinth, and the twelfth amethyst. 21 The twelve gates were twelve pearls: each individual gate was of one pearl. And the street of the city was pure gold, like transparent glass.
The Glory of the New Jerusalem
   
22 But I saw no temple in it, for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple. 23 The city had no need of the sun or of the moon to shine in it,[j] for the glory[k] of God illuminated it. The Lamb is its light. 24 And the nations of those who are saved[l] shall walk in its light, and the kings of the earth bring their glory and honor into it.[m] 25 Its gates shall not be shut at all by day (there shall be no night there). 26 And they shall bring the glory and the honor of the nations into it.[n] 27 But there shall by no means enter it anything that defiles, or causes
  • an abomination or a lie, but only those who are written in the Lamb’s Book of Life.
11  Theology / Debate / Re:Why don't we call for the president to stop killing IRAQI babies? on: November 10, 2004, 02:38:07 PM
Brothers and Sister,
Lets not degrade to the point that Satan is using us to turn on one another. We've seen enough degrading going on over the last several months. This forum is about expressing our views and it is clear that we all have our own viewpoints. I went to bed last night after reading a posting from xjesusrocksx in which he expressed some very hard words. He is certainly entitled to his viewpoint. That was what this election was all about. Although many of us disagree with him, he is certainly entitled to express his views as long as they do not become vulgar. I believe that as Christians we all need to take a stand against the evil that is happening in the world. To me it is just as appalling to turn your back on those that commit such atrocities as it is to commit these atrocities. We have the right to debate these issues but not the right to allow Satan to use these issues for his purpose. I believe that the UN is an organization that Satan has been using to advance his purpose and there is more than enough evidence to prove that. And I believe that America is no longer the Christian nation that it claims to be. But I also believe that whether this nation wants to claim God as it's god or not, God will use this nation to accomplish His purpose. God is the one in control and He will work things out. We are to be His tools to not only spread His word but to also take a stand against evil. Does this mean that the world is going to just fall in line behind us? No it does not. Satan will continue to us to world to separate us from God as much as he can. I applaud those that will stand up against this evil. I also pray for those that will not. Jesus said in the Book of Revelations that there would be no fence walkers in the end times. And we a rapidly approaching His return. Jesus also said in the Book of Matthew that there would be wars and rumors of wars. What is going on is no surprise to Him. I know that He is crying over the loss of life that is happening. But I also know that He cries when we turn our backs on any atrocity. We are all passionate about our beliefs. And Satan is just as passionate in his belief that he does not want God to win this war for our souls. Much of the world has sided with him. He will attempt to destroy the world by turning it against its self. It is very unfortunate that much of the world has made the choice to follow him instead of excepting Gods plan for our salvation. But the harsh reality is that most will reject Gods plan. This does not mean that we are to give up fighting for what is right. Sometimes this means we are to pray. And unfortunately sometimes this means that we are to stand up against such tyrants as Hussein.

12  Theology / Debate / Re:Why don't we call for the president to stop killing IRAQI babies? on: November 09, 2004, 09:58:33 PM
There are those that say that God had no hand in establishing America as a nation. I disagree. There are those that say that God had no hand in dealing with Germany. I disagree. There are those that say that God had no hand in establishing Israel as a nation again. I strongly disagree. And you are right. I have the right to disagree with you. After all this is America. Not Iraq where you could be beheaded for disagreeing. As for the UN maybe you should look at the record for yourself. The record is very clear. I will agree with you on one point. America did help establish the government that Hussein brutally ran for years. And for years America turned its back on the people of Iraq. But God never turned His. Again I ask. Which is worse, the one the does the brutalizing or the one that closes his eyes to the brutalizing?
13  Theology / Debate / Re:Why don't we call for the president to stop killing IRAQI babies? on: November 09, 2004, 07:15:07 PM
I remember seeing video of some of the atrocities that where taking place in Iraq. I'm sure that most Americans saw this same video. The WMD argument that the Democrats keep throwing out there is really no argument at all. This non-since that God does not use people or nations to accomplish His will is also just that, non-since. As I said, most of the world has rejected Christ and has therefore chosen to place itself under Old Testament law. The President went to the UN many times to get them and the world to join with us in stopping Hussein and his henchmen. The reason for the UN's refusal and the refusal of France and other nations to join with us was simple. They would just as soon see Hussein kill his own people and continue giving the UN and it's cronies billions of dollars than do something to stop it. So when you go blaming the President for this war you might want to stop listening to the liberal press that is still whining over Kerry's loose. I don't know any Christian that is not appalled at the loose of life on both sides of this war. I do know that there where many Christians that turned their backs when Hitler did what he did. So you tell me. Which is worse, The one committing the atrocities or the one closing his or her eyes to the atrocities. I don't think God sees any difference.
14  Theology / Debate / Re:Why don't we call for the president to stop killing IRAQI babies? on: November 09, 2004, 01:18:40 PM
There are two things that I see happening. The first is that at least 90% of the world has rejected Christ and has therefore placed themselves directly under the laws of the Old Testament.
The second is that many have forgotten that God has used nations many times to deal with other nations. How many times did He use them to deal with Israel? I also don't think that He is finished dealing with America. We still have abortion on demand going on. We still have homosexual groups pushing their agenda on America. And we still have groups like the ACLU pushing the anti-god agenda. All it takes is for the Christian community to lay down and do nothing. Why do you think that God uses Christians that are willing to speak out against such things. We are setting here debating the issues of right and wrong and often times turning our backs on the things that are going on and pretending that they are not happening. How many of us would stand on a railroad track with a train coming right at us thinking that all we have to do is close our eyes and all will be ok?
15  Theology / Debate / Re:Why don't we call for the president to stop killing IRAQI babies? on: November 09, 2004, 12:40:35 PM
Why don't we just say here, let's hold God accountable here for the killings that are going on in Iraq. Because that seems to be what is being implied here. I myself don't like the fact that innocent people are dying in Iraq. And I definitely want to see our young men and women come home sooner than later. If these foreign fighters that are coming into the country really want peace then why don't they just go home and let the nation of Iraq begin the process of rebuilding its nation. The reason that so many women and children are dying is because these cowards are using them as shields and placing their weapons in hospitals and schools. Tell me, would we allow the military to do this in America. My prayer is that God will watch over the people of Iraq and deal with the criminal element that is trying to destroy any chance for Iraq to come out of this mess as a free democracy.
Pages: [1] 2 3



More From ChristiansUnite...    About Us | Privacy Policy | | ChristiansUnite.com Site Map | Statement of Beliefs



Copyright © 1999-2025 ChristiansUnite.com. All rights reserved.
Please send your questions, comments, or bug reports to the

Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media