ChristiansUnite Forums

He funds abortion, stem cell research, foreign adventures, etc. It's not to say the Dems are better, because they are worse, it's just that the difference is in degree, not in principle.


http://www.ohiocp.org/whynotbush.php

I think it's a sin to support either candidate.

Yep, it's messy no matter how you slice it.

But Bush did answer very well the homosexuality thing - I think, last year, when grilled on it repeatedly.  His reply began with, "We're all sinners...", thus intimating what followed, and that homo'y is a sin, and the only way the opposition responded to that, that I know of, was either to just get mad, or ignore that part of his response altogether.  

I thought he did very well on that.

I see this just the same.

BUSH All The WAy






(http://www.sirinet.net/~blkidps/blgif1.gif)

Another thoughtful post from Brother Love.

I'm still shocked at how Bush's daughters mocked people who believe sex is only proper between married couples at the RNC. But I guess their speechwritters wanted to show that it's "cool" to be conservative.

I understand at least Jenna Bush spends much of her time wiping vomit off her chin after binging at nightclubs.

 That's funny!!

 (http://www.artie.com/99gif/arg-catlaffs.gif)

Did you listen to their speech at the Republican National Convention? What did you think of their Sex and the City joke?

I have a teenaged daughter, and I can't believe she'd say that to my mom.

I guess when you give money to people who work doing stem cell research, traditional child discipline isn't important to you.

I was just comparing Bush's daughters to Kerry's daughters, who are said to be studious and serious. Could Bush qualify as an Elder in the church that you go to with kid's like his?

Nope.  But then he'd have to have been called to be the elder/bishop/pastor role to begin with.  I'm not sure I'd even qualify him to be a deacon.  But let's consider this:


Since we're talking about children, answer this question: is Bush keeping his children submissive?  Not is he keeping them right before God.  That is between them and God, and yes, he will answer before God on that point.  My answer is yes.  His children, who obviously don't have the same morality as their father, are doing what?  Supporting him in his views, and campaigning on his behalf.  They are taking their own views and submitting them to their father's views.  THAT[/b] speaks highly in my book.  Do I agree with his apparent philosophy of letting his children do their own thing rather than teaching them, and forcing them to do the right thing?  No.  But then I'm not going to answer to God for how he's raising his kids.  Does he do it right?  Do you?  Have you ever failed in any area of child rearing?  Again, "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."

Could he be an elder?  No. But he's not running for elder is he?

That was a thoughtful post, and I agree with everything except the last sentence. The most powerful man in the world should have at least the qualifications of a deacon.

Thanks!  But I have to disagree.  We aren't dealing with the body of Christ.  We're dealing with the nation, many of whom are not a part of that body.  I would expect the best from him where he a part of my local church, with the understanding that his position doesn't allow him the opportunity of service that it does other men.  And I would contend that I have yet to see any presidential candidate that would qualify.

Brothers and Sisters,

George W. Bush - A liberal???   ???   ???
What a load of nonsense!

I wonder if we have a troll with us.

I only have one thing to add..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

 :D ;) 8)

All these wise people who can see into other people's hearts, and have such meaningful comments...

ROFL! You mean, by saying things like:

I have explained the two quotes about post deletion twice, and said I was mistaken. The others are fair statements in my opinion.

Now, please take one of those statement and clearly show how they differ from orthodox Christianity.

They may be 'fair' statements in YOUR estimation - but they shore nuff appear as if you can read minds and see into people's hearts! And you may think the comments were 'meaningful' but you may be wrong again. Yes, you admitted you were wrong on the posts deletion. But you were obnoxiously rude when you thought you were right. Admitting the obvious wasn't much of a concession....

I thought we were talking about false teaching?

Tim Vaughan,

I think that most of the forum is talking about you being obnoxiously rude and being a troll. It's been awhile since one person has been so rude to so many people in such a short period of time.


You might want to read the forum rules again. Pay particular attention to the disruptive posts area. We don't have to put up with your rudeness and antagonizing the members of Christians Unite. Please do consider this to be a formal warning.

Moderator

  Did we lose TimV??


       ???


  Maybe he was just having a bad day.


       :-[

day? week more like  >:(

Brother, after 4 warnings and resulting threats from him, he was banned.

Love In Christ,
Tom

Sorta had a feelin' that one was comin'.  Keep up the good work Brother!

ditto  ;)

Bush is the better of the 2 evils and its not a sin to vote for a president.Heres a quote from the bible.





                    Romans 13:1
[ Submission to the Authorities ] Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.  ;D

Bush is liberal he has been correctly compaired to JFK.

says  Reba who is far right of RUSH  :P