Title: Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: A muslim on May 01, 2004, 09:38:28 PM Hello,
Do you think bush sending troops to iraq to destroy family, houses, lives etc was a good thing to do? >:( ??? Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: nChrist on May 01, 2004, 09:55:28 PM Hello, Do you think bush sending troops to iraq to destroy family, houses, lives etc was a good thing to do? >:( ??? Do you think it was a good idea for the world to ignore a madman barbarian who killed 1/2 million or more innocent people and supported terrorism around the world? This would not include the invasion of other countries and the hosts of people who were tortured and lived. ??? Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: BUTCHA on May 01, 2004, 10:03:04 PM Hello, a good thing ? no absolutely not. just the right thing to do..Do you think bush sending troops to iraq to destroy family, houses, lives etc was a good thing to do? >:( ??? its a good thing al gore wasnt president thank you florida :D Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Sapphire W34P0N on May 02, 2004, 12:59:39 PM Do you think bush sending troops to iraq to destroy family, houses, lives etc was a good thing to do?
Yep. You make it sound, though, like every other war in history hasn't torn apart families, houses, and lives. War does that. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: A muslim on May 02, 2004, 05:57:41 PM Saddam was bad yes...but bush has done worse..he said he was going to free the people...but now look at iraq..
what has he done? what? All I was asking was...do you agree with him going there? Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: nChrist on May 02, 2004, 08:29:13 PM Saddam was bad yes...but bush has done worse..he said he was going to free the people...but now look at iraq.. what has he done? what? All I was asking was...do you agree with him going there? Absolutely YES! If I was younger and able, I would sign up and go myself. I would much prefer to fight terrorists on their soil instead of waiting for them to come again to kill our innocent women and children on our soil. It's really very simple. The young men and women in the US Armed Services fight to protect their families. Their hope is their children and grandchildren won't have to fight the same enemies. Their determination is that our freedom and way of life will be preserved. YES!!!!, there is a time for men and women of courage to stand up and fight. Saying that Saddam was better for Iraq is like saying Hitler was better for the Jews. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Forrest on May 03, 2004, 01:03:59 AM Saddam was bad yes...but bush has done worse..he said he was going to free the people...but now look at iraq.. Yes Look at WW-2 it took years for Europe, Japan to recover, many more were killed & mained, but the alturnative is unthinkable.what has he done? what? All I was asking was...do you agree with him going there? Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Tibby on May 03, 2004, 07:03:21 PM Saddam was bad yes...but bush has done worse..he said he was going to free the people...but now look at iraq.. what has he done? what? All I was asking was...do you agree with him going there? Yeah, I'm looking, but I don't see what you are seeing. Don't forget, Forrest, that to the US's efforts, Japan and Germany are some of the most prosperous countries in the world now! It took years and years, but look how they are doing. Personally, I'm against all this American anti-imperialism... Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: BUTCHA on May 03, 2004, 09:00:21 PM Saddam was bad yes...but bush has done worse..he said he was going to free the people...but now look at iraq.. You might ask why do some keep blowing themselfs up trying to kill the us soldiers, the sooner the terrorist let the muslims take cotrol and stop the killing the sooner bush will with draw and then he will spend billions of the us tax payers money to improve the lifes of the common folk so the can live free and equal. but unfortionatly that will never happen ,but that is what he would like to do. but the radicals do not want it to be . praying for all the soldiers and their children and all the inisent in the war,.what has he done? what? All I was asking was...do you agree with him going there? Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: NateyCakes on May 05, 2004, 10:18:14 AM Quote Hello, Do you think bush sending troops to iraq to destroy family, houses, lives etc was a good thing to do? I agree with Blackeyedpeas too. Absolutely yes. Ya know I am really tired of the War is wrong, blah blah propaganda. There was "war" in biblical days too ya know. I am also tired of how so many people are content with what happened on 9/11. Like "Oh, it wasn't that bad....we probably deserved it..." That sort of attitude. Lemme ask you Muslim, did you have anyone who died in those buildings? A family member? A friend? Did anyone you know or related to you die on those planes or in the field that day? Just curious. Probably not, because you might have a different view on things. While the killing is unfortunate, we are not a cowardly nation! We stand up when someone attacks us & I for one am glad that I have bold president who does such. I don't ask anyone to agree with me, but that is how I feel. May I ask you something Muslim? What would you had the US do? Give them a slap on the wrist & say "Now now, that wasn't nice...Next time your gonna be in trouble...." (Total sarcasm) I mean really? Sit back & just let it go? You think this is the end? That the 9/11 was a one time thing & it will never happen again? That is exactly what the terrorists want us to believe. Where we get so comfortable that it's never going to happen & then when you least expect it--AGAIN! In close, Absolutely it was & is right and I pray everyday for all the soldiers and I know we are doing the right thing. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: WolfBrother on May 05, 2004, 10:21:55 AM A muslim,
You wrote: All I was asking was...do you agree with him going there? Absolutely - if I wasn't too old - I'd re-don my Ranger gear and go fight. Better your women and children than ours. The news of 9/11 resulted in people dancing with joy in the streets of a number of Muslim countries. NO leader from the Muslim religion stepped forward to condemn the actions or the celebration and to stop killing of innocents. Until that happens, I have no choice to believe that it truly is a religion by the sword. I will continue to pray for you folks but I will also remain prepared to defend me and mine from an active, ongoing threat. So - again - yes I think we should be there, and in Syria and Iran and any other country that houses a religion that does not condemn suicide bombing and the killing of innocents. And as a "By the Way", we have consistently placed our soldiers in harms way in a greater degree - just to ensure we don't kill innocents. If we weren't concerned about that our response to the desecration of the 4 bodies would have been to destroy the entire city. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Broken on May 07, 2004, 06:36:40 PM And as a "By the Way", we have consistently placed our soldiers in harms way in a greater degree - just to ensure we don't kill innocents. If we weren't concerned about that our response to the desecration of the 4 bodies would have been to destroy the entire city. Instead it appears the response to was to systematically torture and sexually abuse prisoners - and take photographs to show how much "fun" it was. Reports are now saying that children were included in the torture. Way to go. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: nChrist on May 07, 2004, 08:03:22 PM Quote Broken Said: Instead it appears the response to was to systematically torture and sexually abuse prisoners - and take photographs to show how much "fun" it was. Reports are now saying that children were included in the torture. Way to go. Oklahoma Howdy to Broken, That's certainly a horrible criminal act, and those involved should be prosecuted to the limit of the law. For the military people involved, that would mean Leavenworth Federal Prison, and that would be too good for them. A tiny few have smeared the reputation and sacrifice of the many. It's also a horrible thing for the many to bear any punishment or disgrace for something they had no part of. If I were the parent of a young man or woman who gave their life in honor, I would be angry that anyone did something so gross and illegal that it cast a shadow on the honorable service of all. I would be demanding the harshest penalties of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. I'm not a parent who lost a loved one, but I demand the most harsh justice possible. The service of all but a tiny few has been in honor. Love In Christ, Tom Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: JudgeNot on May 07, 2004, 09:32:43 PM “Estimates vary, but at least 80% of the Male prison population in the United Kingdom has suffered some form of sexual abuse, either as children or adults, and many men have been subjected to rape and/or sexual abuse by other prisoners, and in some cases, have also been sexually abused by staff in the jails.”
Source: survivorsswindon.com Statistics for the U.S. are similar, if not higher. My question: Where is the liberal bleeding and outrage for those in our own prisons? Does the victim have to be an Iraqi for it to be inhumane? If you listen to NBC, CBS, ABC, BBC, CNN the answer is a resounding YES! I’m trying to put this in perspective. OK – An army private committed prisoner abuse in Iraq. So, we have a private who reports to a sergeant who reports to a lieutenant who reports to a captain who reports to a major who reports to a colonel who reports to a general who reports to another general who reports to a joint chief of staff who reports to Rumsfeld. So that makes it Rumsfeld’s fault and he should be hanged. Wow! It’s all so clear now! So, if these incidents mean we should impeach the president and leave Iraq, shouldn’t similar measures be taken for rampant prisoner abuse in the UK and the US? That makes perfect since to me. In the UK they need to hang Blair for prison rape, then everyone in the UK (well – ok – only those who wear some kind of uniform – soldiers, police, postmen…) must abandon the Islands. It’s the only solution! The same for the US. Prison rape is rampant – we must impeach Bush and everyone who wears a uniform should run like a lemming into the sea. That will insure peace and harmony among the masses. Yep. That’s the only solution. (I once read about a liberal with common sense. Of course – it was fiction.) ;D I hate election years. I hate politics. I pray for the soldier caught in the middle. May the Lord watch over them, protect them and and lead them not into temptation, but deliver them from the evil one. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: nChrist on May 07, 2004, 11:34:06 PM Quote JudgeNot Said: (I once read about a liberal with common sense. Of course – it was fiction.) I hate election years. I hate politics. I pray for the soldier caught in the middle. ;D Of course it was fiction!!, but we knew that already. We need to take the high ground again. I think that our first step should be to send all the politicians and lawyers to an isolated island and send the ACLU to be their government. There would be wailing and gnashing of teeth all over that island. It would be like Jerry Clowery up in the tree fighting a mountain lion and hollering, "SHOOT UP HERE AMONGST US, ONE OF US GOTS TO HAVE SOME RELIEF!" You have heard Jerry Clowery, right, or is he just known in the South? ;D ;D The above was a quote from Jerry. Tom Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: JudgeNot on May 08, 2004, 12:54:22 AM Jerry Clower for President.
We would be 100 times better off than we are now. 200 times better off than if John "Lurch, Frankenstein, Gomer, They-weren't-medals-only-ribbons, I-don't-drive-an-SUV, give-the-world-to-the-UN" Kerry wins. We REALLY need the true theocracy... Jesus Lord - come soon. AMEN. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Sapphire W34P0N on May 08, 2004, 12:44:03 PM (I once read about a liberal with common sense. Of course – it was fiction.)
Hahaha. How true. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Symphony on May 08, 2004, 08:29:09 PM MUslim said:
Hello, Do you think bush sending troops to iraq to destroy family, houses, lives etc was a good thing to do? Symphony: A major theme of the Old Testament is how God used the surrounding nations to judge Israel in its recurring obstinance and unbelief. Today, in view of the current atrocites being committed by our own troops on Iraqii prisoners, God is using the Muslims to "rub our faces in it"--literally, and to show Americans, on worldwide TV and other media, how immoral we are, and what the price to be paid is, when we trifle with the Almighty, since we still refer to him loosely in some of our secular documentation, and since much of America still classifies itself as *Christian* ::) . Predictably, and consistant with the Old Testament theme, this hypocracy is only fueling Muslim extremists, and others', hatred of us. This is a case of pure textbook judgement, in the same way the hapless Haman was hanged on the very gallows he'd so arrogantly and happily intended for someone else.(book of Ester) We're having to eat crow now, we've laid our own trap, by failing to expose and rebuke increasing wholesale immorality in our own land, we now literally have our troopers practicing it abroad, for all the world to see. And it's simply because we have a system, atmosphere and general "dynamic", that says bacially there is no more immorality, there is no more wrong, there is no more "sin". It only makes sense that our troopers--representatives of us on foreign soil, would act likewise. And the biggest indicator of all of this is, very few if anyone will recognize the connection. At best, most Americans will simply roam the streets, ringing their hands, saying, "it's not my fault". Just like the ancient Israelites--arrogant, self-satisfied, indifferent, careless. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Shammu on May 08, 2004, 11:43:48 PM Saddam was bad yes...but bush has done worse..he said he was going to free the people...but now look at iraq.. No it is not a good thing to do, it is the right thing to do.what has he done? what? All I was asking was...do you agree with him going there? It is also apart of prophecy, in the Holy Bible. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Broken on May 09, 2004, 01:40:24 PM A tiny few have smeared the reputation and sacrifice of the many. It's also a horrible thing for the many to bear any punishment or disgrace for something they had no part of. If I were the parent of a young man or woman who gave their life in honor, I would be angry that anyone did something so gross and illegal that it cast a shadow on the honorable service of all. Its not just those who have already died. Right now, you do not want to be an American and taken prisoner in Iraq. All they're going to think is, if they are going to torture people, they'll get the same back. And the same goes for the UK troops, whether or not those photographs were faked. There is absolutely no way I'd go to Iraq in any capacity in the present conditions, and I pity the people already there - even if they wouldn't dream of hurting an Iraqi prisoner it will be assumed they would torture. And the people aren't that keen on them to begin with... I understand why they're attacking your defence guy though. The people directly involved must (and presumably will) be prosecuted - in fact I should think their lives will be ruined by what they have done. Considering that they have harmed others, and completely and utterly wrecked what was left of America's reputation abroad, that is fine with me. But their superiors must also face something of the rap for this - for allowing conditions to flourish where it could happen, where people could not report what was happening, where it could not have been stopped. And frankly, President Bush has come out of this badly. The fact that he only bothered to apologise when the media found out - is disgraceful. It makes it look - true or not - that he only cares if it might possibly impact his chances in your elections, and that that was the reason he apologised, not because he actually cared. He should also give his scriptwriter the sack, that was a very weird apology he gave, they should have toned up his words an awful lot, it would have meant more. There is something curious about this though. The female soldier who was pictured - well her family, her mother and her sister have been on the news over here in the UK quite a lot, saying that the photo was either staged, faked or she was forced to do as she did. But apparently the US networks are saying that her family have left the country, gone on a holiday or something and cannot be contacted. No idea why that should be, that we are getting news you're not. (I only heard about it because my dad was in Texas last week). JudgeNot, If you wish to be nationalistic about it, may I tell you that we do have concern about the state of our prison system, that we have regular reports and a visiting society - much like the Red Cross - who visit prisoners in an attempt to stamp out the sexual abuse which continues at prisons, and to improve conditions. Psychological and psychiatric help is always available - and I am sure you would be pleased to note that prison chaplaincy is a fast-growing area of Christian ministry. The blame for some of the events in Iraq is being placed on your prison system, apparently one of the soldiers was a prison guard at a notorious American prison. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Sapphire W34P0N on May 09, 2004, 01:53:38 PM It is also apart of prophecy, in the Holy Bible.
*Sigh.* No, it's not. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Tibby on May 09, 2004, 02:44:59 PM Torture, Broken? Torture? PLEASE! Being hung on a cross, that is torture. Being stretched across a rack, that is torture. Cutting finger off, that is torture. Making POWs pile up, not torture. Take pictures of POWs without clothing on, not torture. It those pictures are your idea of "torture" then you need to really think about it. Painful, uncomfortable, yes. But if everything that was painful and uncomfortable was labeled as torture... ::)
The people directly involved will be prosecuted and their lives will be ruined. Military prisons, you sit in the hot sun all day, breaking large boulders into gravel. And after you serve your time, you are then dishonorably discharged, making it next to impossible to get a job, being an ex-con who was dishonorably discharged, with little or no marketable skills. Yeah, looks like dreams really do come true. Just wishing on that star, Broken, maybe America will fall soon, too. ::) Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Sapphire W34P0N on May 09, 2004, 03:42:22 PM And frankly, President Bush has come out of this badly. The fact that he only bothered to apologise when the media found out - is disgraceful. It makes it look - true or not - that he only cares if it might possibly impact his chances in your elections, and that that was the reason he apologised, not because he actually cared.
Ahem. U-2 incident, anybody? Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Broken on May 09, 2004, 08:55:06 PM Torture, Broken? Torture? PLEASE! Being hung on a cross, that is torture. Being stretched across a rack, that is torture. Cutting finger off, that is torture. Making POWs pile up, not torture. Being forced to commit sexual acts? Not torture? Quote Take pictures of POWs without clothing on, not torture. Humiliation of that sort is defined as torture. Quote Just wishing on that star, Broken, maybe America will fall soon, too. ::) Ah, I see, it is acceptable to you for your soldiers to behave in such ways. Dear me, Tibby, it is people like yourself who are giving America an incredibly bad name across Europe and the Middle East. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Tibby on May 09, 2004, 09:48:32 PM Torture, Broken? Torture? PLEASE! Being hung on a cross, that is torture. Being stretched across a rack, that is torture. Cutting finger off, that is torture. Making POWs pile up, not torture. Being forced to commit sexual acts? Not torture? No. Not good, but not torture. And even if it is well... so what? Why are the we only country that has to abide by the Geneva Convention? No one gets upset about other country torturing Americans, with there Government supporting it, but when a set rogue solders mock a few POWs, and the Government frouns on it, we get hammered by every pansy Nation in the World. Quote Quote Take pictures of POWs without clothing on, not torture. Humiliation of that sort is defined as torture. By who? Who defined torture as humilation? Fred Savage? ::) Quote Quote Just wishing on that star, Broken, maybe America will fall soon, too. ::) Ah, I see, it is acceptable to you for your soldiers to behave in such ways. Said who? Not me. ::) Quote Dear me, Tibby, it is people like yourself who are giving America an incredibly bad name across Europe and the Middle East. Well, what can I say, we are the strongest country in the world. We have States larger then most countries. It is to bad you don’t like us, but, well, honestly, there is nothing you can do about it. If you feel so strongly about it, boycott us. Oh wait, most counties are dependent on trade with America, aren’t that? Whine all you want, none of these countries are going to do a thing about it. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Broken on May 09, 2004, 10:53:59 PM No. Not good, but not torture. And even if it is well... so what? Why are the we only country that has to abide by the Geneva Convention? If you want to continue taking the moral high ground that America so likes to take, yes. And no, America is not the only country who abides by it. [quote[No one gets upset about other country torturing Americans, with there Government supporting it, but when a set rogue solders mock a few POWs, and the Government frouns on it, we get our balls busted by every pansy Nation in the World. Quote Ah only pansys do not torture people? If pansys do not torture enemy soldiers then presumably you think the arabs who will, no doubt torture American soldiers are real MEN and just great. Quote By who? Who defined torture as humilation? Fred Savage? ::) By your own country. Quote Said who? Not me. ::) You're certainly giving a good impression of condoning it. Quote Well, what can I say, we are the strongest country in the world. We have States larger then most countries. And few people. Quote It is to bad you don’t like us, but, well, honestly, there is nothing you can do about it. If you feel so strongly about it, boycott us. So let me see, you're saying, we can torture foreigners because we are strong, might makes right, let foreign nations we once swore to protect now bow down before the American super-race!. Thats disgusting. That is also against everything that has ever been good in America. And that is the mentality that led to these atrocities in the first place, the hidebound, insular, ignorant mentality of small-town ill-educated people. And there was I feeling sorry for such people, thinking they must be poor, ill-educated, treat badly by their own government - and then I see it in you. Quote Whine all you want, none of these countries are going to do a thing about it. It is fortunate that I know that most Americans are decent people who do NOT condone torture of other people. We stood up against Hitler, we can do so against America if it ever turns into the tyrannical, evil, immoral nation you seem to wish it will be. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Tibby on May 10, 2004, 01:10:09 AM No. Not good, but not torture. And even if it is well... so what? Why are the we only country that has to abide by the Geneva Convention? If you want to continue taking the moral high ground that America so likes to take, yes. And no, America is not the only country who abides by it. Quote No one gets upset about other country torturing Americans, with there Government supporting it, but when a set rogue solders mock a few POWs, and the Government frouns on it, we get hammered by every pansy Nation in the World. Quote Ah only pansys do not torture people? If pansys do not torture enemy soldiers then presumably you think the arabs who will, no doubt torture American soldiers are real MEN and just great. No one very said the pansies don't. Everyone does. The pansies hide behind the Geneva Convetion when it fits them, and ignore it when it doesn't. Quote Quote By who? Who defined torture as humilation? Fred Savage? ::) By your own country. I'd like to see a citation. Quote Quote Said who? Not me. ::) You're certainly giving a good impression of condoning it. You seem to be the only person who feels that way. Quote Quote Well, what can I say, we are the strongest country in the world. We have States larger then most countries. And few people Um, yeah... Quote Quote It is to bad you don’t like us, but, well, honestly, there is nothing you can do about it. If you feel so strongly about it, boycott us. So let me see, you're saying, we can torture foreigners because we are strong, might makes right, let foreign nations we once swore to protect now bow down before the American super-race!. Quote No, I am not. Read my posts before you attack me. In fact, try to avoid attacking me at all. Get your emotions under controll. I'm saying, if you don't like us, you have every right to boycott. If you are going to hate us, then don't bask is the benefits you get from us. Quote Thats disgusting. That is also against everything that has ever been good in America. And that is the mentality that led to these atrocities in the first place, the hidebound, insular, ignorant mentality of small-town ill-educated people. And there was I feeling sorry for such people, thinking they must be poor, ill-educated, treat badly by their own government - and then I see it in you. Right... ::) Quote Quote Whine all you want, none of these countries are going to do a thing about it. It is fortunate that I know that most Americans are decent people who do NOT condone torture of other people. We stood up against Hitler, You were losing to Hitler untill America came in, as I recall. ::) Quote we can do so against America if it ever turns into the tyrannical, evil, immoral nation you seem to wish it will be. Stop placing words in my mouth. If you would like to debate maturely, fine, but do not put words in my mouth. In short, if you don't like us, then boycott. Whining without actions, that does nothing. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Broken on May 10, 2004, 06:32:27 PM No one very said the pansies don't. Everyone does. The pansies hide behind the Geneva Convetion when it fits them, and ignore it when it doesn't. So, every nation always tortures enemy prisoners? It is a natural thing, we should accept the torture of others as a normal human instinct, and never ever put in place laws against the torture of other human beings. Right. Quote I'd like to see a citation. You have a Constitution, perhaps you should read it sometime. Quote You seem to be the only person who feels that way. It is perfectly clear from your posts that you do not think the torture of Iraqi prisoners a terrible thing at all. Presumably a mentality shared by the torturers themselves. Quote No, I am not. Read my posts before you attack me. In fact, try to avoid attacking me at all. Get your emotions under controll. I'm saying, if you don't like us, you have every right to boycott. If you are going to hate us, then don't bask is the benefits you get from us. Who said I hated America? You seem to be mistaking my dislike of certain traits of some Americans for all of America. Trouble is, idiots always shout loudest, which is why you get such a bad reputation. Your argument appears to be: America is strong, therefore America is right, whatever an American does is right, don't dare oppose us. Rousseau has a lot to answer for. Quote You were losing to Hitler untill America came in, as I recall. ::) Its wonderful, looking at all the American movies rewriting the past to suit their audiences, isn't it? Next thing we know, people will be saying America came into the war to save the Jews! Quote Stop placing words in my mouth. If you would like to debate maturely, fine, but do not put words in my mouth. I am not putting words into your mouth, but following along from what you have said. If you do not like your own conclusions perhaps you should stop holding those ideas. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Tibby on May 11, 2004, 01:46:58 AM No one very said the pansies don't. Everyone does. The pansies hide behind the Geneva Convetion when it fits them, and ignore it when it doesn't. So, every nation always tortures enemy prisoners? It is a natural thing, we should accept the torture of others as a normal human instinct, and never ever put in place laws against the torture of other human beings. Right. Quote I'd like to see a citation. You have a Constitution, perhaps you should read it sometime. I don’t see a part that says Humiliation is torture. Maybe you should read it. Quote Quote You seem to be the only person who feels that way. It is perfectly clear from your posts that you do not think the torture of Iraqi prisoners a terrible thing at all. Presumably a mentality shared by the torturers themselves. I have yet to see any torture of Iraqi prisoners. ::) Quote Quote No, I am not. Read my posts before you attack me. In fact, try to avoid attacking me at all. Get your emotions under controll. I'm saying, if you don't like us, you have every right to boycott. If you are going to hate us, then don't bask is the benefits you get from us. Who said I hated America? You seem to be mistaking my dislike of certain traits of some Americans for all of America. Trouble is, idiots always shout loudest, which is why you get such a bad reputation. Your argument appears to be: America is strong, therefore America is right, whatever an American does is right, don't dare oppose us. Go ahead, oppose us. I'm all for you opposing us. So, why don't you stop whinging and start opposing? Rousseau has a lot to answer for. Quote Quote You were losing to Hitler untill America came in, as I recall. ::) Its wonderful, looking at all the American movies rewriting the past to suit their audiences, isn't it? Next thing we know, people will be saying America came into the war to save the Jews!. Ok, go a head, tell me how it really was, then. ::) Quote Quote Stop placing words in my mouth. If you would like to debate maturely, fine, but do not put words in my mouth. I am not putting words into your mouth, but following along from what you have said. If you do not like your own conclusions perhaps you should stop holding those ideas. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: ollie on May 11, 2004, 02:54:12 AM Hello, a good thing ? no absolutely not. just the right thing to do..Do you think bush sending troops to iraq to destroy family, houses, lives etc was a good thing to do? >:( ??? its a good thing al gore wasnt president thank you florida :D Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Tibby on May 11, 2004, 11:24:36 AM Hello, a good thing ? no absolutely not. just the right thing to do..Do you think bush sending troops to iraq to destroy family, houses, lives etc was a good thing to do? >:( ??? its a good thing al gore wasnt president thank you florida :D Thank the voters. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Allinall on May 11, 2004, 12:57:32 PM Torture, Broken? Torture? PLEASE! Being hung on a cross, that is torture. Being stretched across a rack, that is torture. Cutting finger off, that is torture. Making POWs pile up, not torture. Being forced to commit sexual acts? Not torture? No. Not good, but not torture. And even if it is well... so what? Why are the we only country that has to abide by the Geneva Convention? No one gets upset about other country torturing Americans, with there Government supporting it, but when a set rogue solders mock a few POWs, and the Government frouns on it, we get hammered by every pansy Nation in the World. Quote Quote Take pictures of POWs without clothing on, not torture. Humiliation of that sort is defined as torture. By who? Who defined torture as humilation? Fred Savage? ::) Quote Quote Just wishing on that star, Broken, maybe America will fall soon, too. ::) Ah, I see, it is acceptable to you for your soldiers to behave in such ways. Said who? Not me. ::) Quote Dear me, Tibby, it is people like yourself who are giving America an incredibly bad name across Europe and the Middle East. Well, what can I say, we are the strongest country in the world. We have States larger then most countries. It is to bad you don’t like us, but, well, honestly, there is nothing you can do about it. If you feel so strongly about it, boycott us. Oh wait, most counties are dependent on trade with America, aren’t that? Whine all you want, none of these countries are going to do a thing about it. Of course, I do find it interesting that in a male dominated society which values manhood so highly, that when they take guy, strip him down and have a woman mock his manhood, such things would be very much spirit breaking. And if you're looking for information...just a thought. Not condoning or supporting. Just pointing out the apparantly not blatantly obvious. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Tibby on May 11, 2004, 01:56:39 PM Shameful, allinall, yes, but taking pictures of a mans genital, while humiliating, is not torture. Torture is cutting his **** off with a dull knife, then crushing the **** in a clamp.
Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Broken on May 11, 2004, 07:42:55 PM I don’t see a part that says Humiliation is torture. Maybe you should read it. Try the eighth amendment (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment08/). I should not be having to tell you your own law. Quote I have yet to see any torture of Iraqi prisoners. ::) Try watching the news. Quote Go ahead, oppose us. I'm all for you opposing us. So, why don't you stop whinging and start opposing? I don't want to oppose America as such, I am already opposing you, or hadn't you noticed? Quote Ok, go a head, tell me how it really was, then. ::) Well it certainly wasn't to save the Jews. No country entered the war for that reason. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Tibby on May 12, 2004, 12:42:19 AM I don’t see a part that says Humiliation is torture. Maybe you should read it. Try the eighth amendment (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment08/). I should not be having to tell you your own law. I have some bad news for you. That Constitution, only for Americans. That’s rights. You see, not all leaders feel the need to grant their people these rights. It is a shame. On top of that, Cruel and unusual has been ruled as Torture. And I didn’t see any torture. Quote Quote I have yet to see any torture of Iraqi prisoners. ::) Try watching the news. I'm a Political Science Major, it is a requirement ;D I’m seen High School baseball teams do worse in their hazing of Freshmen. ::) Quote Quote Go ahead, oppose us. I'm all for you opposing us. So, why don't you stop whinging and start opposing? I don't want to oppose America as such, I am already opposing you, or hadn't you noticed? Yeah, you know, it's funny, I haven't had much opposition. Keep trying. Quote Quote Ok, go a head, tell me how it really was, then. ::) Well it certainly wasn't to save the Jews. No country entered the war for that reason. Who said it was to save the Jews? Wars arn't fought for some distant minorities torture (THAT is torture). I never said we fough to save Jews. We did, however, end up saving both the jews AND not-so-Great Britain. Now tell me, how is that rewriting the past? ::) Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: sincereheart on May 12, 2004, 09:42:20 AM The RESERVISTS actions are disgusting! >:(
Whether or not it's 'torture'; it definitely is juvenile and dishonorable. Because of the actions of the Army RESERVISTS they've given our whole military and our whole country a bad name. I think they should be handed over to the Iraqi's to deal with. ::) Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Tibby on May 12, 2004, 12:25:21 PM Only problem is, what Iraqi's? :( There really arn't any Iraqi's to deal with it. We are their policing force, we are there court system, for now, we are there Government. :-\
Besides, it looks like the Iraqi's already handled it in their own way. >:( Ahd it is strange, the media still seems even more outraged about the photo's! >:( Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: new_self on May 12, 2004, 01:58:13 PM Things are not as the News Media reports!!!!!!!!
As I head off to Baghdad for the final weeks of my stay in Iraq, I wanted to say thanks to all of you who did not believe the media. They have done a very poor job of covering everything that has happened. I am sorry that I have not been able to visit all of you during my two week leave back home. And just so you can rest at night knowing something is happening in Iraq that is noteworthy, I thought I would pass this on to you. This is the list of things that has happened in Iraq recently: (Please share it with your friends and compare it to the version that your paper is producing) Over 4.5 million people have clean drinking water for the first time ever in Iraq. Over 400,000 kids have up to date immunizations. Over 1500 schools have been renovated and ridded of the weapons that were stored there so education can occur. The port of Uhm Qasar was renovated so grain can be off loaded from ships faster. School attendance is up 80% from levels before the war. The country had it's first 2 billion barrel export of oil in August. The country now receives 2 times the electrical power it did before the war. 100% of the hospitals are open and fully staffed compared to 35% before the war. Elections are taking place in every major city and city councils are in place. Sewer and water lines are installed in every major city. Over 60,000 police are patrolling the streets. Over 100,000 Iraqi civil defense police are securing the country. Over 80,000 Iraqi soldiers are patrolling the streets side by side with US soldiers. Over 400,000 people have telephones for the first time ever. Students are taught field sanitation and hand washing techniques to prevent the spread of germs. An interim constitution has been signed. Girls are allowed to attend school for the first time ever in Iraq. Text books that don't mention Saddam are in the schools for the first time in 30 years. Don't believe for one-second that these people do not want us there. I have met many people from Iraq that want us there and in a bad way. They say they will never see the freedoms we talk about but they hope their children will. We are doing a good job in Iraq and I challenge anyone, anywhere to dispute me on these facts. So If you happen to run into John Kerry, be sure to give him my email address and send him to Denison, Iowa. This soldier will set him straight. If you are like me and very disgusted with how this period of rebuilding has been portrayed, email this to a friend and let them know there are good things happening. Ray Reynolds, SFC Iowa Army National Guard 234th Signal Battalion ===== I got this in an e-mail and thought I would share. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Broken on May 13, 2004, 12:09:25 AM I have some bad news for you. That Constitution, only for Americans. That’s rights. You see, not all leaders feel the need to grant their people these rights. It is a shame. Naturally you feel that an American is worth more than any other race, including races you are actually ruling. Quote On top of that, Cruel and unusual has been ruled as Torture. And I didn’t see any torture. Cruel and unusual does not just mean "electrodes on the genitals". It was also defined as things like imprisonment without trial, humiliation, sleep deprivation.....etc etc etc. Quote I'm a Political Science Major, it is a requirement ;D I’m seen High School baseball teams do worse in their hazing of Freshmen. ::) Ah, yes the institutionalised torture prevalent among American men. We've heard of that over here. Quote Yeah, you know, it's funny, I haven't had much opposition. Keep trying. You didn't learn much in your political classes, huh? Quote Who said it was to save the Jews? Wars arn't fought for some distant minorities torture (THAT is torture). I never said we fough to save Jews. We did, however, end up saving both the jews AND not-so-Great Britain. Now tell me, how is that rewriting the past? ::) Assuming you were the only ones fighting against the Nazis and making it into a moral crusade makes it plain that the rumours we hear about the state of American education are, alas, true. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Reba on May 13, 2004, 01:21:00 AM Thanks for sharing your email New_Self.
Our service people are mostly good. As in any group of people there are bad 'apples'. Seems many folks here and overseas want America to fail and try hard to make it seem as she has failed. I have distant family over there and their reports agree with your email. Thanks to all who serve... Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Tibby on May 13, 2004, 01:42:31 AM I have some bad news for you. That Constitution, only for Americans. That’s rights. You see, not all leaders feel the need to grant their people these rights. It is a shame. Naturally you feel that an American is worth more than any other race, including races you are actually ruling. Actually, that isn’t I said. ::) Quote Quote On top of that, Cruel and unusual has been ruled as Torture. And I didn’t see any torture. Cruel and unusual does not just mean "electrodes on the genitals". It was also defined as things like imprisonment without trial, While that is wrong, it is not counted under the phrase "Cruel and unusual " in the 8th amendment. That is the Fifth Amendment. Quote humiliation, I would love to see that in writing. Quote sleep deprivation.....etc etc etc. Yeah, that counts. Why does it count, you ask? Simple: that is Torture... ::) Quote Quote I'm a Political Science Major, it is a requirement ;D I’m seen High School baseball teams do worse in their hazing of Freshmen. ::) Ah, yes the institutionalised torture prevalent among American men. We've heard of that over here.. If you think it is just American Men, you have another thing coming. ::) Quote Quote Yeah, you know, it's funny, I haven't had much opposition. Keep trying. You didn't learn much in your political classes, huh?. Oh, I learned plenty. Quote Quote Who said it was to save the Jews? Wars arn't fought for some distant minorities torture (THAT is torture). I never said we fough to save Jews. We did, however, end up saving both the jews AND not-so-Great Britain. Now tell me, how is that rewriting the past? ::) Assuming you were the only ones fighting against the Nazis and making it into a moral crusade makes it plain that the rumours we hear about the state of American education are, alas, true. Who said we where the only ones? France fell and England was in shambles when America joined, and this joining turned the war. Do you deny this? Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: nChrist on May 13, 2004, 10:36:32 AM Quote New_Self Said: This soldier will set him straight. If you are like me and very disgusted with how this period of rebuilding has been portrayed, email this to a friend and let them know there are good things happening. Oklahoma Howdy to New_Self, I am a proud Navy dad. My son serves on the Nimitz. You are right that the news media is not covering all of the good that's being done. You are giving an entire country freedom, but you are also making sure your children and grandchildren have freedom. MY SINCERE THANKS!!!! Love In Christ, Tom Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: Willowbirch on May 13, 2004, 03:32:44 PM Its not just those who have already died. Right now, you do not want to be an American and taken prisoner in Iraq. All they're going to think is, if they are going to torture people, they'll get the same back. I've read that the cell in which Iraqi prisoners were mistreated was the same building in which Saddam Hussein and his friends routinely raped and tortured Iraqi people. What we did was wrong; but surely it occurs to you that, while some of America's soldiers grossly overstepped their bounds, our government and its Army are disgusted and willing to punish such behavior, whereas the government of Saddam approved it. The very fact that our media is blasting President Bush, our army, etc. for this crime shows how quick America is to condemn such practises. Under the "Old regime", if an athlete performed poorly, they were likely to be beaten or raped. Athletes now live in much less fear of such cruel treatment from their own leaders. America has made some mistakes, of course; its war, expect it. But the men and women who are fighting out there are fighting for justice, and I don't believe it is right to smear everyone for the war crimes of a few. Title: Re:Bush in iraq..good or not? Post by: sincereheart on May 15, 2004, 06:42:52 AM http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4982402/ (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4982402/)
This what makes me so angry about what the abuse scandal has caused: Quote "We're out here working our rears off, every day, and most people embrace us," said Haggart, a pale 21-year-old from Vancouver, Wash. But, he said, the uproar over prisoner abuse "has tarnished that." Quote Disclosure of prisoner abuse has further complicated life for front-line soldiers, mostly by giving resistance leaders a new rallying point against the occupation. Quote But they worried that a group described by one sergeant as "a few stupid privates" has tainted the collective mission in the eyes of the world, including an American public bombarded with the images in the news media. But this is my fervent hope: Quote Spec. Dainon Jensen, a 25-year-old from Portland, Ore., predicted that the scandal "will blow over after people are punished. What we're doing here is going to have to work. If America will ever be secure, places like Iraq will have to govern themselves. That's what America really has to give." |