Title: The Patriot Post Digest 08-38 Post by: nChrist on September 20, 2008, 09:44:29 PM ______________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 08-38 From The Federalist Patriot ______________________________ THE FOUNDATION “I Pray Heaven to Bestow The Best of Blessing on THIS HOUSE, and on ALL that shall hereafter Inhabit it. May none but Honest and Wise Men ever rule under This Roof!” - President John Adams PATRIOT PERSPECTIVE John McCain: Veteran Faith By Mark Alexander “And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.” (John 8:32) “For I have learned the truth: There are greater pursuits than self-seeking. Glory is not a conceit. It is not a decoration for valor. It is not a prize for being the most clever, the strongest, or the boldest. Glory belongs to the act of being constant to something greater than yourself. No misfortune, no injury, no humiliation can destroy it. This is the faith that my commanders affirmed, that my brothers-in-arms encouraged my allegiance to. It was the faith I had unknowingly embraced at the Naval Academy. It was my father’s and grandfather’s faith. A filthy, crippled, broken man, all I had left of my dignity was the faith of my fathers. It was enough.” - John McCain in Faith of my Fathers, his 1999 book on military tradition, his family, and his faith. John McCain is a man of strong faith - a faith tested by torturous hardship few men have faced. It is a faith that wholly informs his character, his integrity, his purpose, his mission, his worldview. Those who know John McCain well - his family, friends, pastor, political colleagues, and those Patriot veterans who suffered beside him as Prisoners of War - describe many facets of his personality. Their descriptions are of a man who is complicated and diverse, but to a person, they recognize him as a man of deep and abiding faith. McCain, however, is a man who says little about his spiritual convictions, perhaps in constancy with the counsel of 12th-century Friar Saint Francis of Assisi: “Go forth and preach the Gospel; if necessary use words.” As was the case with most of our Founders, who did not endeavor to make America a “Christian Nation” (though many of them worked tirelessly to forge a “Nation of Christians”), McCain does not make public declarations of his faith when campaigning for political office. While he does not use his faith as a political platform, he certainly does not subscribe to the errant “Separation of Church and State” doctrine, nor does he hesitate to identify himself as a Christian when asked. Rick Warren, pastor of California’s Saddleback Church, interviewed Senators McCain and Obama in August, asking them what it meant to be a Christian. John McCain required no teleprompter for his answer, stating flatly: “It means I’m saved and forgiven.” McCain attends North Phoenix Baptist Church, a Southern Baptist congregation, though his “quiet faith” is surely more in keeping with his upbringing in the historic but now troubled Episcopal Church. His Baptist pastor, Dan Yeary, says of McCain, “It is a privilege and an honor to be this close to a man I’ve learned to love, who has the potential to be a great president for our country. I certainly am in favor of God’s endorsement on his life.” Biographer Paul Alexander writes that McCain’s quiet faith is also the result of military tradition: “He’s a very spiritual person but... in his core, he’s a military man. They don’t feel comfortable talking about religion.” Perhaps not in uniform, anyway. In Faith of My Fathers, McCain says his father, a full admiral and son of a full admiral, was also a man of quiet faith, who knelt twice daily for devotions with a prayer book frayed from use. For his part, McCain wrote that he really came into account with his Creator when he was a POW. A long-time McCain friend, Col. Bud Day, a Medal of Honor recipient and fighter pilot who, like McCain, was shot down over Vietnam, met McCain when they became roommates at the infamous “Hanoi Hilton.” Col. Day was a senior officer among the POWs and, recognizing McCain’s faith, appointed him a chaplain to their fellow prisoners. Day says that McCain “remembered the Episcopal liturgy, and sounded like a bona fide preacher.” _______________________________ Title: The Patriot Post Digest 08-38 Post by: nChrist on September 20, 2008, 09:45:49 PM ______________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 08-38 From The Federalist Patriot ______________________________ Though McCain initially treated the assignment lightly, it was a turning point for him: “I’ll never forget that first Christmas when I... read from the Nativity story... And I looked in that room around and there were guys who had already been there for seven years and tears were streaming down their face, not out of sorrow, but out of joy that for the first time in all that captivity, we could celebrate the birth of Christ together. It was more sacred to me than any service I had attended in the past, or any service I have attended since.” Of faith tried and tested, McCain writes, “Our senior officers always stressed to us the three essential keys to resistance, which we were to keep uppermost in our mind, especially in moments when we were isolated or otherwise deprived of their guidance and the counsel of other prisoners. They were faith in God, faith in country, and faith in your fellow prisoners... Without faith, we would lose our dignity, and live among our enemies as animals lived among their human masters.” “POWs often regard their prison experience as comparable to the trials of Job. Indeed, for my fellow prisoners who suffered more than I, the comparison is appropriate. Hungry, beaten, hurt, scared, and alone, human beings can begin to feel that they are removed from God’s love, a vast distance separating them from their Creator. The anguish can lead to resentment, to the awful despair that God has forsaken you. To guard against such despair, in our most dire moments, POWs would make supreme efforts to grasp our faith tightly, to profess it alone, in the dark, and hasten its revival.” “Once I was thrown into another cell after a long and difficult interrogation. I discovered scratched into one of the cell’s walls the creed ‘I believe in God, the Father Almighty.’ There, standing witness to God’s presence in a remote, concealed place, recalled to my faith by a stronger, better man, I felt God’s love and care more vividly than I would have felt it had I been safe among a pious congregation in the most magnificent cathedral.” Anyone who has been through life-changing trauma will understand these words John McCain wrote about prayer: “There were many times I didn’t pray for another day and I didn’t pray for another hour - I prayed for another minute to keep going.” Of McCain’s courage and fortitude, Col. Day says with certainty, “He wasn’t corruptible then, he’s not corruptible today.” Capt. Tom Moe, who also got to know the real John McCain while they were imprisoned together, says that one of his strongest recollections of McCain was one day when McCain’s captors were returning him to his cell after torturous interrogations. Moe looked through a pinhole in his door as McCain looked back in the direction of his cell and gave him a smile and thumbs up: “I look back and that vision of him looking over at me and going ‘we’re going to pull through this’ under terrible, terrible conditions is a great memory for me.” Another of McCain’s fellow POWs, and one of my personal heroes, Col. Roger Ingvalson, told me this week, “I spent two years with John McCain in some of the worst circumstances imaginable. I have spent time with John under much better circumstances in the years since. John McCain has the highest integrity of any political leader I have ever had the privilege of knowing, and I have known plenty.” In this political season, many political stump speeches end with the words, “God Bless America.” But rest assured, when John McCain uses those words, they are much more than an obligatory footnote. Quote of the week “I’m not running for president because I think I’m blessed with such personal greatness that history has anointed me to save our country in its hour of need. My country saved me... and I cannot forget it. And I will fight for her for as long as I draw breath, so help me God. I’m going to fight for my cause every day as your president. I’m going to fight to make sure every American has every reason to thank God, as I thank Him: that I’m an American, a proud citizen of the greatest country on earth, and with hard work, strong faith and a little courage, great things are always within our reach. Fight with me. Fight for what’s right for our country. Fight for the ideals and character of a free people. Fight for our children’s future. Fight for justice and opportunity for all. Stand up to defend our country from its enemies. Stand up for each other, for beautiful, blessed, bountiful America. Stand up and fight. We’re Americans, and we never give up. We never quit. We never hide from history. We make history. Thank you, and God bless you, and God bless America.” - John McCain, concluding his nomination acceptance speech _______________________________________ Title: The Patriot Post Digest 08-38 Post by: nChrist on September 20, 2008, 09:47:28 PM ______________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 08-38 From The Federalist Patriot ______________________________ On cross-examination “I believe he’s a man of deep convictions and authentic Christian faith.” - former Arkansas Gov. (and Southern Baptist pastor) Mike Huckabee, who has spoken with John McCain at length about his faith GOVERNMENT & POLITICS News from the Swamp: Congressional update Congress may be headed for another lame-duck session, which should come as no surprise to anyone outside the Swamp. Every election year in recent memory has seen Congress returning after the break for a short session to wrap up business that for one reason or another couldn’t be completed during the previous 180 days. The reason behind this year’s tardiness has to do with the overtime posturing and underachieving leadership of the dynamic Democrat duo of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). They have spent so much time trying to surrender in Iraq and investigate every member of the Bush administration that little items like funding the government for fiscal 2009 seem to have slipped their minds. The new fiscal year begins 1 October, and there has yet to be a single budget resolution brought to a vote. (Some would consider this wonderful news.) In the waning days and hours, Democrats figure on funding the government at least through next February as well as addressing energy proposals, defense policy measures, and a potential second economic “stimulus” plan - because the first one worked so well. Reid is also taking another crack at getting his omnibus package passed - the same one that Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) sank six weeks ago. The 35-bill omnibus consists of a number of smaller earmarks and assorted legislative bric-a-brac that any fiscal conservative would find wasteful. Reid was irate at losing to Coburn, but this time around he has Oprah Winfrey on his side. Winfrey, who has become a reliable Democrat media heavyweight, called on her 44 million viewers to support S. 1738, the Combating Child Exploitation Act, which is part of the omnibus. She has done her best to frame the fiscally responsible Coburn as an ogre for not supporting the measure. A closer look at the bill reveals a great deal of wasteful spending. Coburn wants a Republican amendment that would grant law enforcement greater access to the online records of suspected sexual predators. Democrats are against this for two reasons: First, this provision is against the broad civil liberties they want to maintain for the nation’s criminals. Second, it is a provision that was advanced by Sen. John McCain, and what Democrat wants to give him a legislative victory? Rather than meet Coburn halfway, Reid will try to get the bill passed in the classic liberal fashion - allow no debate and call a voice vote. In the House: Rangel fights to hang on Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) is refusing to accede to subtle suggestions from Speaker Nancy Pelosi and senior Democrat colleagues to step down as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee while he is being investigated for a number of ethical lapses. Publicly, however, Speaker Pelosi backs Rangel, despite her vow to clean up Congress. “I see no reason why Mr. Rangel should step down,” she said. Last week, Rangel admitted to playing fast and loose with reporting and paying taxes on at least $75,000 in rental income on a villa he owns in the Dominican Republic. He is also being examined for below-market rentals on several New York City apartments and engaging in fundraising on congressional stationery for an academic center named after him. Rangel is reluctant to step aside, but even Democrats see the double standard here, since they are always bent on having Republicans relinquish their leadership posts during ethics investigations. Rangel still has the full-throated support of his Harlem district, but his actions could taint Democrat races across the board in November, including Barack Obama’s presidential run. Perhaps it’s time McCain called on Obama to ask for Rangel’s resignation. While Obama is unlikely to embrace this “Sister Souljah” moment, it would be fun to watch him squirm. New & notable legislation The House voted 266-152 Wednesday to repeal the District of Columbia’s continued ban on guns. After the Supreme Court affirmed the meaning of the Second Amendment in June, the District had thumbed its nose at the Court, maintaining its ban on semi-automatic handguns while allowing registered revolvers that were kept unloaded and with a trigger lock. The House bill takes away DC’s ability to write its own gun laws. However, it faces a stiff challenge in the Senate. “If this bill comes to the floor of the United States Senate, I will do everything in my power to stop it,” said gun-grabbing Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA). The Senate is working on several appropriations bills this week, including one for defense. The interesting thing about this bill is that Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK) managed to secure $215 million in earmarks in the legislation, up from $195 million last year. That’s quite a trick for a guy who’s been indicted on corruption charges and is currently standing trial. ____________________________________________ Title: The Patriot Post Digest 08-38 Post by: nChrist on September 20, 2008, 09:49:18 PM ______________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 08-38 From The Federalist Patriot ______________________________ Campaign watch: Show me the money Despite worries earlier this month of slowing financial support, Barack Obama continues to break presidential campaign fundraising records. He broke the previous monthly fundraising record that he had established earlier this year by raising $66 million in August. His campaign claims thousands of new donors, but a $28,500-a-plate dinner with Barbra Streisand and the Who’s Who of Hollywood’s useful idiots last week didn’t hurt, bringing in $9 million. As late-night comedian Jay Leno quipped, “To be fair, it did include an all-you-can-eat salad buffet.” Obama’s unprecedented fundraising brings his total to $440 million so far. The Republican money machine has its work cut out for it, but so far it is meeting the challenge. John McCain raised $47 million in August, a personal record, and his adherence to public financing will give him $84 million to spend throughout the general election. While these figures are eclipsed by Obama’s, McCain can count on solid backing from the RNC, which raised $6 million more than its Democrat counterpart last month. Obama is not so fortunate. Campaign finance analysis indicates that Democrats are not reaping financial rewards en masse. It also suggests that Republicans are spending their money more wisely than the Democrats. Imagine that. Obama, however, will be getting more than mere money on the campaign trail in the ensuing weeks. He has added a teleprompter to his entourage, even for outdoor venues. Sure, all politicians frequently operate from prepared texts and often repeat the same speech over and over again on the campaign trail, but imagine seeing a teleprompter at a casual political rally. Supporters in Pueblo, Colorado, saw what should now be dubbed the “Obamaprompter” in action in the middle of an outdoor rodeo ring. Such foolishness may prevent the Great Orator from making stupid “lipstick-on-a-pig” statements, but it will only reinforce the fact that he cannot think on his feet and is helpless without a prepared text. The upcoming debate next Friday should be interesting. Palin’s email cracked The Associated Press reports, “Hackers broke into the Yahoo! e-mail account that Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin used for official business as Alaska’s governor, revealing as evidence a few inconsequential personal messages she has received since John McCain selected her as his running mate.” The FBI and Secret Service are on the case, hoping to catch the Leftist yahoo who illegally obtained access to Palin’s account. The Left has been fit to be tied since John McCain chose Palin as his running mate in August, looking under every rock and pebble for something to bring her down. So far, though, it’s only made them look bad. One final detail: When asked by the Secret Service for copies of the “leaked” emails, the AP “did not comply,” claiming First Amendment rights. First of all, the emails weren’t “leaked,” they were stolen. Furthermore, the AP is in possession of illegally obtained material that doesn’t belong to them, but they will not turn over said material because they have a right to keep it. So that’s how the First Amendment works. We wonder how eager to comply the AP would have been if it had been Joe Biden’s e-mail that had been hacked. Income Redistribution: Patriotic taxes “We want to take money [from the wealthy] and put it back in the pocket of middle-class people,” Democrat vice-presidential nominee Joe Biden said in an interview this week on ABC’s “Good Morning America.” Talking about the “fundamental differences” between Obama/Biden and McCain/Palin, Biden said that wealthier Americans would indeed pay more taxes. “It’s time to be patriotic... time to jump in, time to be part of the deal, time to help get America out of the rut.” Memo to Joe: The forced redistribution of wealth is socialism, not patriotism. Also, your memory must be failing you. Bill Clinton raised taxes, resulting in lower federal revenue, while George W. Bush lowered taxes, resulting in higher federal revenue. As Barack Obama said in April, however, he wouldn’t raise taxes to increase revenue, but “for the purposes of fairness.” By which he means sticking it to “the rich,” a category that includes most of the small-business owners who generate the majority of our nation’s jobs. Biden released his tax returns this week. The unfortunate man is one of the poorest members of the Senate, having claimed a paltry $248,754 in income in 2007. What is likely more important is that his donations to charity average out to about $2 per week. Compared to the charitable giving of McCain (27 percent) and even Obama (five percent), Biden comes off as a cheapskate - at least with his money. Strange, but this story has somehow escaped Leftmedia analysis. Predictably, they just spit out some of Biden’s income numbers and then turned on GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, who has not disclosed her income tax returns. At least Biden’s $995 in charitable giving last year was more than Al Gore’s $353 in 1997. Liberals just walking the walk... ________________________________________ Title: The Patriot Post Digest 08-38 Post by: nChrist on September 20, 2008, 09:50:44 PM ______________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 08-38 From The Federalist Patriot ______________________________ This week’s ‘Braying Jenny’ award “Barack Obama has made an intelligent choice for the vice-presidency. How so very different this is from that bucket of fluff that the Republican candidates have chosen for the same position.” - Obama supporter Barbara Theaker introducing Joe Biden at a rally this week NATIONAL SECURITY Barack Obama, Surge-Suppressor We note with bittersweet reverence the passing of the torch for Multi-National Force Iraq from Gen. David Petraeus to Gen. Ray Odierno. Gen. Petraeus’ outstanding leadership has been a regular part of these pages. Indeed, who can forget the remarkable counterinsurgency strategy he devised and executed - the so-called “surge” - rescuing Iraq from the brink of all-out civil war? In little more than 18 months, Gen. Petraeus transformed Iraq from a would-be haven of chaos and despair into a nascent foothold of freedom in the Middle East. Even so, he cautioned that insurgent extremists - though greatly weakened - still had not yet been entirely defeated. Petraeus also described his replacement as “the perfect man for the job.” We certainly hope so. Petraeus’ surge arrived not a moment too soon. Thanks to its success, discussions of “drawdowns” and “transitioning missions” can now be made with a straight face, as Iraqi forces shoulder increasing responsibility for countering the ever-weakening insurgency. Why can’t we find such people to run our government? Evidently, however, drawdown discussions should be tabled - at least, that is, until “President Obama” assumes office. The New York Post is reporting that while publicly campaigning for a speedy withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, Sen. Barack Obama has privately attempted to convince Iraqi leaders to delay any drawdown agreement until after a new U.S. administration arrives (read: his). The Post cited Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, who stated that Obama’s demand for a delay was a central topic of discussions with Iraqi leaders in July. “He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the U.S. elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington,” Zebari said. Why a delay? So Obama can take credit for pulling U.S. forces out of Iraq, of course. Nothing to see here, folks... just move along. A study in contrasts: John McCain said, “I’d rather lose an election than lose a war.” Barack Obama says, “I’d rather lose a war than lose an election.” Pakistan: Friend or Foe? Recent U.S. and NATO cross-border raids and missile strikes in the mountainous Pakistani tribal areas along the Afghanistan border are starting to strain U.S./Pakistani relations, leading to orders for Pakistani troops to fire on U.S. troops caught in Pakistani territory. Allegedly, warning shots were fired toward U.S. troops on Monday as they crossed from Afghanistan while pursuing Taliban insurgents. At least, that’s the “official” version being fed to the public. The orders were given Tuesday in response to a 3 September ground attack by U.S. commandos inside Pakistan against Taliban and al-Qa’ida forces. American officials have confirmed that U.S. forces carried out the 3 September raid near the town of Angoor Ada, but few details have been released. Meanwhile, U.S. missile strikes, including one on Wednesday, have sent at least two senior al-Qa’ida commanders and many more jihadis to “paradise.” While there is little doubt that the raids are stirring up the Pakistani population that is sympathetic to the Taliban, the official reaction from Islamabad may be little more than a PR smokescreen designed to show that Islamabad will protect Pakistan’s sovereignty. Behind the scenes, Pakistan’s military has won praise from the U.S. for a recent offensive in the tribal region that killed about 700 insurgents. And on Tuesday, Pakistani troops backed by air strikes killed eight insurgents. Pakistan’s new civilian leadership, which has taken a much harder line against Islamic militants since President Pervez Musharraf resigned last month, has said that Pakistan must resolve tensions with the U.S. through diplomatic channels, another indication that the “shoot first” order is intended more to soothe public anger rather than truly confront American troops. As Pakistani Major General Athar Abbas said, Pakistani officials must consider public opinion, which carries a lot of sympathy for rebels fighting in the name of Islam. Here’s hoping the smokescreen works, as both U.S. and Pakistani forces continue to root out additional terrorists. ___________________________________________ Title: The Patriot Post Digest 08-38 Post by: nChrist on September 20, 2008, 09:52:27 PM ______________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 08-38 From The Federalist Patriot ______________________________ U.S. Air Force Birthday Born of the desire to defend liberty and spread its flame, the United States Air Force celebrated its 61st birthday on 18 September. The Air Force began life as the Army Air Corps but became a separate Armed Services Branch when the Department of the Air Force was created by the National Security Act of 1947. On 18 September 1947, W. Stuart Symington became the first Secretary of the Air Force. In wishing a happy birthday to the Air Force, Adm. Michael Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, quoted Leonardo da Vinci: “Once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward.” He added, “When Americans look up, they see thousands of contrails carrying freedom and hope across the globe. And when Americans look up, they see the greatest Air Force the world has ever known!” As the U.S. Air Force continues its critical role in “The Long War” against Jihadistan, we ask that you pray for these brave Patriots standing in harm’s way and for the families awaiting their safe return. BUSINESS & ECONOMY Economic turmoil The recent series of worsening banking crises sent shivers through most Americans this week. Mortgage behemoths Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were taken over by the Fed last week, followed this week by the failure of the investment firm Lehman Brothers. What caught most people off guard, however, was the sudden distress and rescue of insurance giant American International Group (AIG), or, as an Obama press release referred to the company earlier this week, “the American Insurance Group.” The Federal Reserve agreed to the bailout for AIG to the tune of $85 billion after the company failed to get a bank loan to prevent bankruptcy. The federal government now effectively controls the company. Unlike the trouble at Lehman Brothers, if AIG had collapsed, the ripple effect would have been catastrophic. As The New York Times reports, “The complexity of A.I.G.’s business, and the fact that it does business with thousands of companies around the globe, make its survival crucial at a time when there is stress throughout the financial system worldwide.” Indeed, AIG is a brick among dominoes. Naturally, Democrats are attacking Republicans for the continuing slide in the financial markets. Sen. Joe Biden declared this week that John McCain’s domestic policies mirrored those of President Bush, who is “firmly in the corner of the wealthy and well connected.” After making these comments, he shamelessly joined “The One” at the aforementioned $28,500-per-plate dinner with Barbra Streisand and the rest of Hollywood’s wealthy and well connected. Obama, Biden and other Democrats believe the current slide can be stopped only by increased regulatory oversight. Talk about “more of the same.” Banking and securities is not exactly a field bereft of regulatory oversight. The average community bank has no fewer than two regulatory agencies reviewing its operations and its underwriting procedures at a transactional level. Additionally, most community banks also have an independent audit conducted annually. With the possible exception of the medical field, banking is the most examined of all professions. Jerry Bowyer, chief economist at Benchmark Financial Network, faults regulations themselves for the mess: “Large financial institutions like Lehman Brothers built their balance sheets under certain sets of rules. But then those rules were changed. In the wake of the Enron scandal, numerous regulations were modified in ways that guarded against future attempts to make corporate earnings appear to be higher than they really were.” Bowyer continued, “These companies built their balance sheets over many decades under what were then the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Did we think that changing those rules in a flurry of legislative retribution would not have tremendously disruptive effects on those balance sheets? Did our legislators think about the effects at all? Apparently not.” Regulatory Commissars: Drilling and refining Thanks to government restrictions passed by congressional Democrats, American oil and energy production has been rendered more vulnerable to hurricanes because Congress chose to concentrate our energy production in Hurricane Alley. The federal government restricts offshore oil exploration and production largely to the central and western Gulf of Mexico. Adding to the bureaucratic-induced vulnerability, Congress has concentrated the majority of our refineries in the Gulf, while 64 percent of our imported oil enters through Gulf ports. Concentrating vulnerable energy production facilities in hurricane territory causes price spikes at the gas pump whenever one of the frequent storms visits the region. The Petroleum Institute reports less than 20 percent of the area on the federal Outer Continental Shelf is open to exploration and development, although there is a total of 115 billion barrels of oil available in the U.S. In addition, offshore Alaska’s coast holds some 27 billion barrels of crude, while waters near California may hold 11 billion barrels. The Atlantic coastline will yield an estimated four billion barrels of black gold as well. Despite the oil’s accessibility, this energy bounty is available only to foreign exploitation thanks to House Speaker Pelosi’s vow to “save the planet” by inhibiting oil exploration. ________________________________________ Title: The Patriot Post Digest 08-38 Post by: nChrist on September 20, 2008, 09:54:13 PM ______________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 08-38 From The Federalist Patriot ______________________________ Until limousine liberals like Speaker Pelosi realize that their personal jihad to save the planet from imaginary threats is only punishing the Average Joe, taxpayers will continue to bear the brunt of Green extremism. So, on Tuesday, the Democrat-ruled House passed the American Energy Security and Consumer Protection Act by a vote of 263-189. Characterized by the MSM as repealing the ban on offshore drilling, the bill would open coastal waters only beyond 100 miles from shore, unless the adjacent state allows drilling 50 miles offshore. Oddly enough, most known deposits of oil are found within the 50-mile limit. CNS News reports, “In addition, the bill retains a ban in parts of the Eastern Gulf of Mexico until 2022, bans any drilling within 125 miles of the Florida coastline, and permanently blocks drilling in all national marine monuments and national marine sanctuaries.” In other words, Democrats want to look as if they are doing something while still doing nothing. Meanwhile, President Bush has promised to veto the bill, which would not only keep the new ban from being enacted, but leave the current ban to expire. Investing in nuclear power It’s not often that a liberal and conservative think tank unite behind a single issue, but the conservative Heritage Foundation and the liberal Third Way have found a goal they share: expanding nuclear power in the United States. According to a joint study entitled “American Jobs and the Nuclear Renaissance” and conducted for the think tanks by Oxford Economics, USA, the construction of 53 new nuclear plants would create jobs, cut domestic demand for fossil fuels and save the United States as much as $9 billion in annual energy imports. Even France has figured that out. Opposing government investment in nuclear power, however, is the libertarian Cato Institute, whose senior fellow Jerry Taylor points to the private sector’s refusal to invest in and insure nuclear energy. “It’s very risky to loan money to nuclear power,” Taylor says. “That’s a market verdict that I think ought to be respected.” Taylor’s view is warranted when discussing bio fuels or embryonic stem cell research, but not nuclear power. What Taylor is missing in the nuclear discussion is that investors don’t fear nuclear energy itself but rather the government overregulation that has all but stifled the industry over the last 30 years. In all likelihood, the free market would rush to invest in nuclear energy - if government would deregulate it. CULTURE Climate change this week: Palin on warming The Leftmedia and their accomplices in political circles... er, maybe that’s the other way around. We get confused. Regardless, liberals have been gleefully criticizing Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin for “changing” her stance on global warming to sync with her running mate, John McCain, in her interview with ABC’s Charlie Gibson. On the subject, Gibson asked, “Do you still believe that global warming is not man made?” Palin responded, “I believe that man’s activities certainly can be contributing to the issue of global warming, climate change,” but it could also be natural planetary “warming and cooling trends.” The exchange quickly became more intense. Gibson replied, “Yes, but isn’t it critical as to whether or not it’s man-made because what you do about it depends on whether it’s man-made.” After he added, “Color me a cynic, but I hear a little bit of change in your policy there... It sounds to me like you’re adapting your position to Sen. McCain’s,” Palin shot back, “I think you are a cynic because show me where I have ever said that there’s absolute proof that nothing that man has ever conducted or engaged in has had any affect, or no affect, on climate change.” Indeed, Palin’s position has not changed and it is essentially the position we in our humble shop have espoused for some time. The climate may be getting warmer and man may have something to do with it (though we doubt that part), but there is little that we consider conclusive proof of either assertion - assertions usually made by Leftists who are simply aiming for more government regulation. From the ‘Non Compos Mentis’ File According to the Associated Press, Cubans, by virtue of living under a communist dictatorship, are pros when it comes to evacuating from deadly hurricanes. It is true that they keep the (natural) death toll to a minimum - in the past decade, only 23 people in Cuba have died as a result of hurricanes. Or so that’s what the Cuban government would have us believe. The AP outlines the sophisticated evacuation procedures employed by Cuba during the recent onslaught of Hurricanes Gustav and Ike, such as passing out evacuation plans in plenty of time before the storm hits, using schools and government buildings as shelters, and employing volunteers and police to ensure that everyone is safe. Evacuation occurs in a nice, orderly fashion, the article states, as opposed to those disorganized Americans who clog highways and try to get on crowded flights. It’s so much easier in Cuba, after all, where most people do not own automobiles. The article points out that the Cubans must be innovative in their planning, because the U.S. embargo has robbed Cuba of the money to build hurricane-proof buildings. But that’s okay, because the Cuban government, which controls most of the island’s resources, does not have to buy supplies and services from private contractors and is, therefore, much more efficient. The AP reporter left no stone unturned in her paean to the Castro regime. “And because police keep a close eye on evacuated areas,” the article states, “and because most Cubans have few possessions of value anyway - looting isn’t a major concern.” Let us thank the Leftmedia for once again pointing out what an albatross we have around our necks, living here in our free capitalist society. And last... This just in: Eating veggies can be harmful to your health. At least eating only veggies. Oxford University scientists have discovered that people on a meat-free diet are six times more likely to suffer brain shrinkage, anemia and inflammation of the nervous system. Vegans and vegetarians are the most likely to be vitamin B12 deficient, which causes said afflictions, because meat, fish and milk are the best sources of the vitamin. The question, if readers will forgive the metaphor, is this: Which came first, the chicken or the egg? For if one completely rejects meat, there must already have been some prior brain shrinkage. Furthermore, vegetarians and vegans are more likely to be liberal, which could account for the anemia and nervous system inflammation. Perhaps these scientists simply have the report backwards. Veritas vos Liberabit - Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus, et Fidelis! Mark Alexander, Publisher, for The Patriot’s editors and staff. (Please pray for our Patriot Armed Forces standing in harm’s way around the world, and for their families - especially families of those fallen Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen, who granted their lives in defense of American liberty.) |