ChristiansUnite Forums

Entertainment => Politics and Political Issues => Topic started by: Soldier4Christ on July 23, 2007, 04:28:06 PM



Title: Democrat denied access to terror response
Post by: Soldier4Christ on July 23, 2007, 04:28:06 PM
Democrat denied access to terror response
'We're talking about the continuity of the government of the United States of America'

DeFazio asks, but he's denied access
Classified info - The congressman wanted to see government plans for after a terror attack


Oregonians called Peter DeFazio's office, worried there was a conspiracy buried in the classified portion of a White House plan for operating the government after a terrorist attack.

As a member of the U.S. House on the Homeland Security Committee, DeFazio, D-Ore., is permitted to enter a secure "bubbleroom" in the Capitol and examine classified material. So he asked the White House to see the secret documents.

On Wednesday, DeFazio got his answer: DENIED.

"I just can't believe they're going to deny a member of Congress the right of reviewing how they plan to conduct the government of the United States after a significant terrorist attack," DeFazio says.

Homeland Security Committee staffers told his office that the White House initially approved his request, but it was later quashed. DeFazio doesn't know who did it or why.

"We're talking about the continuity of the government of the United States of America," DeFazio says. "I would think that would be relevant to any member of Congress, let alone a member of the Homeland Security Committee."

Bush administration spokesman Trey Bohn declined to say why DeFazio was denied access: "We do not comment through the press on the process that this access entails. It is important to keep in mind that much of the information related to the continuity of government is highly sensitive."

Norm Ornstein, a legal scholar who studies government continuity at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said he "cannot think of one good reason" to deny access to a member of Congress who serves on the Homeland Security Committee.

"I find it inexplicable and probably reflective of the usual, knee-jerk overextension of executive power that we see from this White House," Ornstein said.

This is the first time DeFazio has been denied access to documents. DeFazio has asked Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., to help him access the documents.

"Maybe the people who think there's a conspiracy out there are right," DeFazio said.


Title: Re: Democrat denied access to terror response
Post by: Shammu on July 23, 2007, 06:01:57 PM
There is only one reason I can see DeFazio, wanting to see classified material.  But I'll be nice, and not say anything. :D


Title: Re: Democrat denied access to terror response
Post by: nChrist on July 23, 2007, 06:10:46 PM
 ;D

I won't be nice. It's only common sense that we don't want all of our secret plans in the newspapers for terrorists to read. In the real world, you just don't tell your enemies what you're going to do in advance, but politicians don't seem to understand this MOST BASIC FACT.

OR WORSE - they understand and do it anyway. We really need to hang a few politicians for TREASON and stop this kind of nonsense.


Title: Re: Democrat denied access to terror response
Post by: Soldier4Christ on July 23, 2007, 06:35:58 PM
There is an old saying, "loose lips sink ships" and "a need to know" both apply in this case. Just because a person is on a congressional committee such as the Homeland Security Committee does not mean they necessarily have a need to know. Especially since many of these people are leaking information out.

I agree completely, a few convictions of treason might tighten up some of those lips.



Title: Re: Democrat denied access to terror response
Post by: gymforlord on July 23, 2007, 06:46:48 PM
There is an old saying, "loose lips sink ships" and "a need to know" both apply in this case. Just because a person is on a congressional committee such as the Homeland Security Committee does not mean they necessarily have a need to know. Especially since many of these people are leaking information out.

I agree completely, a few convictions of treason might tighten up some of those lips.


While I agree, I hate to jump to conclusions that he would want it for those reasons, but do agree that not everybody needs access to that sort've confidential info.
And you guys can GUESS my views on treason...


Title: Re: Democrat denied access to terror response
Post by: Soldier4Christ on July 23, 2007, 07:14:04 PM
Seeing as how Defazio is on the Transportation and Infrastructure committee and chairs the Transportation subcommittee on Highways and Transit and in this capacity has fully supported the NAU (although he claims to be against such) and has taken campaign cash from donors who have publicly supported Hamas and other terrorist organizations, I would have little doubts as to the purpose he wants this information.