ChristiansUnite Forums

Theology => Apologetics => Topic started by: Tibby on October 25, 2003, 08:38:41 PM



Title: Metro
Post by: Tibby on October 25, 2003, 08:38:41 PM
What are your thoughts on this Metrosexual fad (at least I hope it's a fad!)? Is it a sin? Why or not why?


Title: Re:Metro
Post by: Whitehorse on October 25, 2003, 09:44:18 PM
I've never heard of it. What is it?


Title: Re:Metro
Post by: Tibby on October 25, 2003, 10:25:41 PM
I envy your ignorance. Metrosexual, also know as the guys Tibby beat up in grade school. It is the latest attempt by the Gay community to made homosexuality “ok” Metrosexuals are peoples who act gay in everyway, but are in fact straight, but very famine. That’s right ,they like women, like them so much, they act like them! It is the latest fad, and the new definition of the word “Renaissance man.”


Title: Re:Metro
Post by: Tamara on October 26, 2003, 07:56:00 AM
Yes, Tibby is right.  There are alot of these people around now.  And, it's just another way of flaunting themselves in a sick manner before the world.  I think they need a good kick by the laws of the land.  But, that won't happen!
These people are not homosexuals.  They pretend they are and act as though they are women.  Yet, they are men. Men?
What am I saying here?  They'd be most offended if I said that!

Love...Tamara.


Title: Re:Metro
Post by: WhitehorseToo on October 26, 2003, 10:33:38 PM
Oh, that is really sick! But I wouldn't worry too much-I think it'll all die out, and here's why:

If they're acting gay, but they're straight, they ain't gonna have much luck in the marriage depqrtment, if you know what I mean. Who would want 'em?


Title: Re:Metro
Post by: Tibby on October 26, 2003, 11:06:07 PM
Yeah, a lot of girls just don’t like guys who are like that. They like tough guys over pansies. I have personally proven this. Not that I’m bragging... ;) ;D


Title: Re:Metro
Post by: WhitehorseToo on October 26, 2003, 11:10:04 PM
Yeah, what woman would want a guy who is prettier than she is?  ;D


Title: Re:Metro
Post by: ebia on October 27, 2003, 12:39:59 AM
Oh, that is really sick! But I wouldn't worry too much-I think it'll all die out, and here's why:

If they're acting gay, but they're straight, they ain't gonna have much luck in the marriage depqrtment, if you know what I mean. Who would want 'em?
You think this behaviour is genetic?


Title: Re:Metro
Post by: Petro on October 27, 2003, 01:55:56 AM
Oh, that is really sick! But I wouldn't worry too much-I think it'll all die out, and here's why:

If they're acting gay, but they're straight, they ain't gonna have much luck in the marriage depqrtment, if you know what I mean. Who would want 'em?
You think this behaviour is genetic?

Liberals would like others to believe, genetics has to do with this.

A certain homsexual doctor, several years back, tried that explanation a few years  back, but unfortunatly it didn't fly.

Then the evos, tried the homsexual genetic traits of the duck.

This behavior, may be more closely associated to individuals, because of domineering alpha female mother's  behaior in the home, of single parent families, or two parent families, where the father is not a leader.

But, genetic??  Its doubtful................

Petro


Title: Re:Metro
Post by: ebia on October 27, 2003, 03:05:17 AM
Quote
Liberals would like others to believe, genetics has to do with this.

A certain homsexual doctor, several years back, tried that explanation a few years  back, but unfortunatly it didn't fly.

Then the evos, tried the homsexual genetic traits of the duck.
We're not talking about homosexuality here, but so called "metrosexuality".

I was trying to point out the inconsistency of people claiming it is a modern fad, and then suggesting it will die out because of genetics.

Quote
This behavior, may be more closely associated to individuals, because of domineering alpha female mother's  behaior in the home, of single parent families, or two parent families, where the father is not a leader.
Any evidence for that, or just supposition?


Title: Re:Metro
Post by: Tibby on October 27, 2003, 08:44:55 AM
But Edia, YOU brought up the genetics! We never said anything was genetic. Untill a few years ago, It was a mental illness. But, even is it is genetic, so what? Cancer is genetic, too. Sickel Cell, genetic. Gene's can't prove anything. DOn't get me wrong, IU don't think it is genetic, but if I'm wrong, and it is genetic, that doesn't mean it is any less of a sickness.


Title: Re:Metro
Post by: ebia on October 27, 2003, 07:05:19 PM
But Edia, YOU brought up the genetics! We never said anything was genetic.
You (or rather Whitehorse) said you expected it to die out through (lack of) breeding.  That implies genetics.

Quote
But, even is it is genetic, so what? Cancer is genetic, too. Sickel Cell, genetic. Gene's can't prove anything. DOn't get me wrong, IU don't think it is genetic, but if I'm wrong, and it is genetic, that doesn't mean it is any less of a sickness.
Doesn't prove it is one either.


Title: Re:Metro
Post by: WhitehorseToo on October 27, 2003, 07:47:54 PM
You think this behaviour is genetic?

Well, I don't remember saying that; I'm saying, how long will people want to do something that keeps 'em from finding a girlfriend? Gays go for other guys, regular people go for the opposite sex; who does the metro guy get? No one! They're not gay, and not a girl on the face of the planet is going to be attracted to that. How long do you suppose they'd really keep it up? Wouldn't they want to get married at some point? Or at least do what unbelievers do?


Title: Re:Metro
Post by: WhitehorseToo on October 27, 2003, 07:49:35 PM
But Edia, YOU brought up the genetics! We never said anything was genetic. Untill a few years ago, It was a mental illness. But, even is it is genetic, so what? Cancer is genetic, too. Sickel Cell, genetic. Gene's can't prove anything. DOn't get me wrong, IU don't think it is genetic, but if I'm wrong, and it is genetic, that doesn't mean it is any less of a sickness.

You said, it Tib! And they can still master their own behavior.